Disposing Of Pharmaceutical Waste: Some Progress


In 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) seemed to be on the road to providing some much-needed clarity to hospitals and other medical facilities concerning the disposal of pharmaceuticals by proposing that hazardous waste pharmaceuticals be handled as Universal Wastes (a simpler regulatory regime that would improve proper disposal). Five years later, new waste management standards for hazardous waste pharmaceuticals (albeit only from health care facilities) are under development, with a proposal anticipated to be published for public comment in August 2013. Meanwhile, in the absence of clear federal guidance, states have adopted a variety of policies; for example, Kansas, Florida and Michigan require some form of best management practices for nonhazardous pharmaceuticals (through exemptions, policies or guidance and with differences in the details).

Part of the confusion about the proper disposal method for pharmaceutical waste is due to the fact that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) regulates controlled substances (which have the added concern that these “drugs” may be diverted to illegal use). In late December 2012, DEA (after consultation with EPA) issued a proposed rule that allows ultimate users to deliver the controlled substances to a third party, expands the list of those who can collected unwanted controlled substances (beyond law enforcement officials), and allows the disposal of commingled pharmaceutical waste and controlled substances (a more cost-effective approach). This proposal will establish three voluntary options: (a) a take-back event; (b) mail-back programs; and (c) collection receptacles at law enforcement offices, retail pharmacies, and long-term health care facilities.

There is also some progress in determining the degree to which pharmaceutical chemicals have already been released in the environment (e.g., approximately 81 pharmaceutical chemicals have been found in drinking water at miniscule concentrations (part-per-trillion levels). Disparate federal agencies (EPA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the United States Geological Survey) now are working together to improve the monitoring of pharmaceuticals in drinking water (in both ground and surface water). However, the toughest task is still ahead – deciding whether and at what concentration to regulate these chemicals. According to EPA’s Deputy Administrator Robert Perciasepe, action to limit discharges from sewage plants is likely years away and may involve actions that differ from the traditional regulatory command and control approach.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pepper Hamilton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.