District Court Decision Opens Door to Additional Patent Term Adjustment

more+
less-

In Exelixis, Inc. v. Kappos, a federal district court overturned the USPTO’s interpretation of the patent term adjustment (“PTA”) statute, finding that a Request for Continued Examination (“RCE”) filed after three years from the patent application filing date does not impact PTA. The decision, if not reversed on appeal, could significantly extend the term of many patents. Although it is likely that the USPTO will appeal the decision and the finality of the district court’s holding remains uncertain, holders of patents should review their patents and consider taking relevant action in view of this decision.

PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT STATUTE AND USPTO INTERPRETATION -

35 U.S.C. § 154 establishes that the term of a U.S. patent expires 20 years from the earliest effective non-provisional U.S. filing date of the patent application. To compensate for USPTO delays during the patent examination process, Congress enacted 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1), which provides “guarantees” against three different types of delays...

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »