District court finds that insurance premium excise tax does not apply to retrocession transactions

by DLA Piper
Contact

On February 5, 2014, the US District Court for the District of Columbia held that the federal excise tax ("the FET") on insurance and reinsurance premiums does not apply to retrocession insurance transactions.1  Under a plain reading of the statute, the court reasoned, premiums with respect to such retrocession policies are not subject to the FET.  Of note, the court specifically declined to rule on whether the FET could be applied with respect to foreign-to-foreign reinsurance transactions (as opposed to retrocession transactions) for US-situs risks.  Retrocession agreements are essentially reinsurance agreements between reinsurers.  Clients who have paid such amounts on (or had such amounts deducted or withheld from) retrocession premiums are urged to file refund claims in order to preserve their right to such refunds.

Background and Court Challenge

Generally, section 4371(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code")2 imposes a 1% tax upon each policy of reinsurance whereby a contract of reinsurance is made, continued or renewed, if issued (1) by a nonresident alien individual, a foreign partnership or a foreign corporation, as reinsurer; and (2) to any person against, or with respect to any policy of (A) casualty insurance or an indemnity bond or (B) life, sickness, or accident insurance, or annuity contract, in each of (A) and (B) where the insurance related to US-situs risks.

The IRS has taken the position that the FET applies on a "cascading basis"—that is, it applies sequentially to every insurance and reinsurance arrangement regarding the same US risk without regard to whether such risk has already been subject to the FET.3  In conjunction with this ruling position, the IRS announced a voluntary compliance initiative pursuant to which foreign persons who, inter alia, had failed to pay the cascading FET could become compliant with how the IRS views the law.4  Many taxpayers questioned the IRS’ view, especially in light of case law that explicitly rejects a cascading theory of tax, although in the context of withholding taxes on royalties.5  In January of 2013, Validus Reinsurance, Ltd., a Bermuda based reinsurer, filed a tax refund suit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the imposition the FET on a cascading basis on premiums that it paid in connection with retrocession contracts it entered into outside of the US with non-US reinsurers where a portion or all of the underlying insurance risks were US-situs.

Court’s Analysis and Holding

In Validus’ summary judgment motion, it asserted that, among other arguments, the FET did not apply extraterritorially, the FET did not apply to retrocession agreements, the application of the FET extraterritorially violates international law and due process, and the IRS’ interpretation exceeds Congress’ taxing power.

The court found that the case presented a straightforward question of law and gave its opinion based on summary judgment motions submitted by the parties and undisputed material facts.  This question was whether Section 4371(3) (which applies to reinsurance transactions) imposes the FET on retrocession insurance transactions. The court concluded that under the plain language of the statute, the definition of the term "policy of reinsurance" did not include retrocessions.  Accordingly, the court granted the taxpayer’s motion for summary judgment and ordered the US to refund the money Validus paid to satisfy the claimed deficiency.

In its conclusory paragraph, the court stated that Section 4371 does not impose an excise tax on retrocession insurance transactions,6 however, it explicitly noted that its "decision is in no way predicated on [Validus’] argument that Congress did not intend and does not have the power to tax purely foreign-to-foreign insurance transactions."  Thus, a foreign direct insurer that reinsures US-situs risks with a foreign reinsurer is still potentially subject to extraterritorial application of the FET.

Implications

Although this ruling can be appealed by the government to the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, it represents a favorable development for reinsurance companies that have either been subjected to the cascading FET or that are negotiating contracts that provide for withholding or deduction of such FET.

Reinsurers that have paid the FET (or had such FET withheld or deducted from premiums paid to them) with respect to retrocession agreements should consider filing protective refund claims with the IRS before the applicable statute of limitations expires (generally the later of three years from the date that the original return was filed or two years from the date that the FET was paid) to preserve their refund claims. 

A reinsurer negotiating retrocession agreements should consider including provisions in the agreements that require the retrocedent to submit refund claims on its behalf, in the event the retrocedent insists on withholding or deducting the FET.

1 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2013cv0109-29

2 All Section references are to the Code.

3 The IRS ruled on March 7, 2008 that the tax would apply to all contracts with an underlying risk based in the US, irrespective of whether or not payments to a retrocedent had already been subject to the tax. See Rev. Rul. 2008-15, 2008-12 IRB.

4 Announcement 2008-18, 2008-1 CB 667, 03/07/2008.

5 In SDI Netherlands B.V. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. 161 (1996),  the Tax Court rejected the cascading theory in the context of a withholding tax on US-source royalty stating "[w]e are not disposed to conclude, in the absence of legislative expression on the subject, that Congress intended the statutory provision to permit ‘cascading' with the question of relief left to the mercy of the respondent."

6 The court defined retrocessions as "a form of reinsurance … when a reinsurer buys insurance from yet another insurance company ("a retrocessionaire") to protect the reinsurer in the event that it is required to pay claims under one or more of the reinsurance policies that it has issued to the direct insurers."

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.