District Court Rejects Fraud-on-the-FDA Theory of False Claims Act Liability

more+
less-

In an opinion that continues a welcome trend in False Claims Act cases, Judge Saylor of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has dismissed a relator’s FCA complaint for failing to plead facts demonstrating that a manufacturer’s breach of the Food & Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) adverse event reporting requirements resulted in any false claims against federal health care programs. United States ex rel. Ge v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. (Nos. 10-11043-FDS; 11-10343-FDS) (Nov. 1, 2012). Judge Saylor’s opinion, like other recent opinions of Judges Gorton and Stearns in the District of Massachusetts, reflects an appropriate judicial resistance to attempts to convert any and all alleged regulatory violations into liability under the FCA, especially when the agency in question has broad discretion in how to respond to regulatory non-compliance.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  False Claims Act, Fraud-on-the-FDA, Manufacturers

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Government Contracting Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ropes & Gray LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »