On April 18, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York again held that YouTube is subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as an internet service provider despite alleged general knowledge of extensive copyright infringement.
The case was initiated in 2007 by Viacom and others against YouTube for the alleged hosting of copyright infringing materials. In 2010, the District Court determined on summary judgment that YouTube fell within the safe harbor of the DMCA (718 F.Supp.2d 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)). That decision was appealed to the Second Circuit, which vacated the decision and remanded, focusing on whether there was knowledge of “specific infringements” rather than generalized knowledge of infringement. The Second Circuit remanded the case back to the District Court to determine whether, based on the record, YouTube: (a) had knowledge or awareness of specific infringements, (b) was willfully blind to specific infringements, (c) had the “right and ability” to control the infringing conduct, and (d) stored any syndicated clips at the direction of users. 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012). On all of these issues on remand, Judge Louis Stanton of the Southern District of New York held for YouTube.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Copyright, DMCA, Infringement, ISPs, Safe Harbors, Viacom, Viacom v YouTube, Willful Blindness, YouTube
Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Intellectual Property Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Venable LLP | Attorney Advertising