Dobbas v. Vittas: Excess Liability Insurer Not Permitted to Intervene in Insurance Agent Malpractice Case To Pursue Equitable Subrogation Against the Agent


In a published decision in Dobbas v. Vitas (California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District), the California Court of Appeal addressed the right of an excess insurance carrier to intervene in a insurance agent malpractice action for the purpose of seeking equitable subrogation against the agent. To the relief of the agent, intervention was not allowed.

A bull had escaped from a rancher’s property and caused a fatal automobile accident on a nearby road. The victims filed suit against the rancher, and it was discovered that the rancher’s insurance agent had either cancelled or failed to renew one of the rancher’s excess insurance policies which may have provided coverage for the incident. Accordingly, the rancher filed a complaint for malpractice against the insurance agent for failing to procure the excess policy.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Sedgwick LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.