Dobbas v. Vittas: Excess Liability Insurer Not Permitted to Intervene in Insurance Agent Malpractice Case To Pursue Equitable Subrogation Against the Agent


In a published decision in Dobbas v. Vitas (California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District), the California Court of Appeal addressed the right of an excess insurance carrier to intervene in a insurance agent malpractice action for the purpose of seeking equitable subrogation against the agent. To the relief of the agent, intervention was not allowed.

A bull had escaped from a rancher’s property and caused a fatal automobile accident on a nearby road. The victims filed suit against the rancher, and it was discovered that the rancher’s insurance agent had either cancelled or failed to renew one of the rancher’s excess insurance policies which may have provided coverage for the incident. Accordingly, the rancher filed a complaint for malpractice against the insurance agent for failing to procure the excess policy.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »