Due to the increasing number of federal government investigations and the broad wording of new, yet uninterpreted, federal law, it is important that, if an organization has any reason to think it might be investigated, the organization suspend its document destruction policy.
Several recent high-profile cases have taught large companies (both public and private) and their lawyers important lessons about document retention, particularly if litigation or a government investigation of any kind is foreseeable. Indeed, had 18 USC § 1519 been enacted when Arthur Andersen was indicted, the reversal of its conviction for obstruction of justice in January 2005 may have been less likely.i That statute had its genesis as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act reform.
Please see full article for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Criminal Law Updates, Commercial Law & Contracts Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Lane Powell PC - White Collar Criminal Defense & Regulatory Compliance | Attorney Advertising