Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: FDIC Proposes Rules Regarding Receiver’s Right to Enforce Subsidiary and Affiliate Contracts of Covered Financial Company


In its continued effort to implement certain provisions of its authority to resolve “covered financial companies” under Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), on March 20, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) approved proposed rules relating to Enforcement of Subsidiary and Affiliate Contracts by the FDIC as Receiver of a Covered Financial Company (the “Proposed Rules”). For a detailed discussion of Title II, see the White & Case Client Alert titled Orderly Liquidation Authority, dated July 2010.

The Proposed Rules are intended to implement section 210(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, codified at 12 U.S.C. §5390(c)(16), which permits the FDIC as receiver of a covered financial company to enforce contracts of subsidiaries or affiliates of the covered financial company despite contract clauses that purport to terminate, accelerate or provide for other remedies based on the insolvency, financial condition or receivership of the covered financial company. The FDIC’s enforcement authority is not without conditions, however. In order to enforce these contracts, the FDIC must first either (i) transfer supporting obligations of the covered financial company that back the obligations of the subsidiary or affiliate under the contract (along with all assets and liabilities that relate to those supporting obligations) to a bridge financial company or qualified third-party transferee by the statutory one-business-day deadline; or (ii) provide adequate protection to such contract counterparties. From a creditor perspective, it is important to note that this authority is in stark contrast to the Bankruptcy Code, which does not permit a bankruptcy trustee to enforce contracts between non-debtors. According to the FDIC, its ability to enforce subsidiary and affiliate contracts will provide it substantial flexibility by allowing it to only place certain entities of a corporate family into receivership where the FDIC believes it would maximize the value of the receivership.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© White & Case LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.