Does “Blowing the Whistle” Include Reporting On Workplace Problems As Part of an Employee’s Everyday Duties?


A recent unpublished Appellate Division decision, White v. Starbucks Corp., 2011 WL 6111882 (Dec. 9, 2011), provides a textbook example of how New Jersey’s whistleblower statute, the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. § 34:19-1 to -8 (“CEPA”), is being used by employees to sue under circumstances far broader than ever was contemplated by the Legislature in passing the act. The White case addresses a critical issue: if an employee/manager is tasked with ensuring workplace safety, and writes up complaints to upper managers about workplace safety issues and hazards as part of her job responsibilities rather than to object to illegal or dangerous employer practices, can the employee claim down the road (after she is fired), that she was previously “blowing the whistle” on illegal activities?

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kevin O'Connor, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »