DOMA And Immigration: Practical Implications Of The Supreme Court’s Decision

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in United States v. Windsor. The Court ruled that a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which had denied federal benefits to same-sex partners, is unconstitutional.

The legal impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling means that same-sex spouses are now entitled to the same treatment under federal law as opposite-sex spouses. In the immigration context, same-sex spouses will now have access to immigration benefits. In our blog post of July 8, 2013, we discussed the practical effect of this ruling on those individuals who may potentially benefit from its consequences. You can view this analysis here.

Though federal agencies have been instructed to accept same-sex filings immediately, individuals who may benefit from this ruling should anticipate that confusion on the part of federal authorities over the new directive, and the lack of practical guidance in the administration of same-sex immigration benefits, will lead to delays and possible rejections and denials of visa applications as the government reviews the impact of the decision on existing law and develops guidance.

Ogletree Deakins is monitoring the procedural changes at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the U.S. Department of State as a result of the Supreme Court’s Windsor ruling and will provide updates as further guidance on the implementation of the decision becomes available.

Note: This article was published in the 07-15-2013 issue of the Immigration eAuthority.

Topics:  Civil Unions, DOMA, Domestic Partnership, Immigrants, Marriage, Same-Sex Marriage, SCOTUS, US v Windsor, Visas

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Family Law Updates, Immigration Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »