Duty Of An Insurer To Defend An Additional Insured

Many commercial contracts require the seller to maintain insurance against stated risks and also requires that the purchaser be named an additional insured under the seller’s insurance policies. This typically requires that the seller’s insurer issue a policy endorsement naming the purchaser as an additional insured.

Being named an additional insured provides protection and gives rise to a duty to defend and indemnify if the purchaser is sued and the claim relates to matters covered under the seller’s policy.

But what happens if a lawsuit arises and the seller’s insurance company refuses to defend the additional insured or pay any damages suffered by the additional insured? Does the seller’s insurance company meet its obligation to an additional insured by defending only the seller and paying amounts the seller is held liable for? Does this satisfy its obligations?

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Peter S. Bauman - Senior Commercial Litigation Attorney Callahan & Blaine, (714) 241-4444 (office) / (949) 842-1720 (mobile) | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


(714) 241-4444 (office) / (949) 842-1720 (mobile) on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.