Education Law Report Vol. XXIV No. 3, 2013

more+
less-

IN THIS ISSUE:

- Kindergarten Students Subject to Compulsory Attendance Requirements Upon Enrollment:

After obtaining custody of her twin daughters, Jennifer Ann Kerstetter enrolled them in the kindergarten program at the West Beaver Elementary School in the Midd-West School District in Snyder County, Pennsylvania for the 2011 2012 school year.

- Constitutional Challenge to Student Drug Testing Policy Denied:

In February 2011, the Loyalsock Township School District adopted a policy providing for the random and suspicionless testing of students as a condition to participation in extra-curricular activities or to obtain a school parking permit. As justification for the testing program, the policy cited examples of documented prior drug and alcohol incidents, the longitudinal results of a biannual survey of school district students in grades 6, 8, 10 and 12 regarding drug and alcohol usage and anecdotal evidence of drug/alcohol-related abuse among students. The policy was the result of a year-long study of drug and alcohol abuse among students, multiple committee meetings involving school directors, administrators, students and parents, the review of the student drug-testing programs at other school districts and several public meetings.

- Third Circuit Affirms Students’ Right to Wear “I [Heart] Boobies!” Bracelets:

Two middle-school students (“Students”) purchased bracelets bearing the slogan “I [heart] boobies! (KEEP A BREAST)” as part of a nationally recognized breast- cancer-awareness campaign. The Easton Area School District (“District”) banned the bracelets, relying on its authority under Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986), to restrict vulgar, lewd, profane, or plainly offensive speech, and its authority under Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), to restrict speech that is reasonably expected to substantially disrupt the school.

- Right-To-Know Law Update:

The following is a collection of recent decisions by Pennsylvania courts and the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records (OOR), interpreting the provisions of Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), 65 P.S. § 67.101, et seq.

Please see full report below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Tucker Arensberg, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×