EEOC Issues New Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination

Clients often call with questions regarding their need to provide accommodations to pregnant women.  In fact, I received such a call last week and was working through a particularly complicated issue when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued new guidelines yesterday attempting to clarify how employers must accommodate employees with pregnancy-related disabilities.  While pregnancy accommodation laws have been around since at least 1978 (at the federal level), the parameters of such protections are not a model of clarity.

Adopting the new guidelines proved to be a controversial matter for the five EEOC Commissioners. They were adopted by a mere 3-2 vote.  Two Commissioners opposed issuing any guidelines while the Supreme Court had yet to decide the case of Young v. UPS which is on the Court’s docket.  The Court’s decision in Young is not expected until the Court’s next term.  Other commissioners felt that confusion regarding proper accommodations of pregnant women under federal law persists to such a degree that a clarification was necessary immediately; it could not be delayed until the Supreme Court decided Young. 

One such clarification makes is that pregnancy-related conditions must be treated the same as disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act –  meaning that a reasonable accommodation must be offered so long as it does not represent an undue hardship for the employer.  This what we have been advising our clients for many years, but it is nice to see that the EEOC agrees with us.  Additionally, it is now clear that lactation is protected as a medical condition.

The protections under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act are in addition to those provided by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the ADA, the FMLA, and all corresponding state statutes.  In Connecticut, for example, it has long been the rule that pregnant employees are entitled to reasonable leave (unpaid unless an employer specifies otherwise) for a disability relating to a pregnancy or postpartum condition.  The new EEOC Guidance can be found here.

The takeaway for employers is that medical conditions relating to pregnancy must be accommodated just as any other disability.  Now, more than ever, each situation must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis to avoid discrimination claims.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pullman & Comley - Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.