EIB Energy Highlights: New FERC Chair, Offshore Drilling-NC Says “No,” Atlantic Coast Pipeline EIS, Clean Air & More

by Moore & Van Allen PLLC
Contact

Our goal is to serve as a leading-edge resource for companies navigating the rapidly evolving landscapes of the domestic and global energy markets. Moore & Van Allen’s EIB Energy Highlights is a complement to our Energy Interdependency Blog’s in-depth individual treatment of critical issues emerging in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation. EIB Energy Highlights hits the highlights of recent energy developments, streamlining access to critical information for our readers. Subscribe to the Energy Interdependency Blog via email or RSS to ensure that you receive EIB Energy Highlights, as well as our comprehensive posts. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the materials covered.


Natural Gas

    • U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Exports to Northwestern Europe Symbolic: In recent years, the concerns of many European countries dependent upon Russia to provide access to critical energy resources have intensified. The first exports of U.S. LNG to Northwestern Europe arrived in the Netherlands and Poland in early June, symbolizing the potential of a new balance in European energy supply. For the countries “in Russia’s shadow,” U.S. LNG provides the opportunity to diversify their energy resources and reduce Russia’s ability to leverage access to energy in political struggles with surrounding countries. The U.S. is expected to become the world’s third-largest LNG supplier by 2020.
    • DOE Authorizes Additional U.S. LNG Exports: The Department of Energy (DOE) recently announced the authorization of additional LNG exports from the Lake Charles facility in Louisiana. Lake Charles previously received authorization to export up to 2 Bcf/day to countries with which the U.S. has free trade agreements (FTA countries) and non-FTA countries. This new authorization allows an additional 0.33 Bcf/day of exports to FTA and non-FTA countries. As such, Lake Charles currently is authorized to export a combined total volume of 2.33 Bcf/d to FTA and non-FTA countries. The DOE also recently authorized LNG exports to non-FTA countries from the Delfin floating facility in the Gulf of Mexico offshore of Louisiana on June 1, 2017. According to the DOE, a total of 21.33 Bcf/d of U.S. natural gas exports to any country in the world have been authorized to date. A summary of the status of U.S. LNG export applications as of June 30 is available here.
    • FERC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement for Atlantic Coast Pipeline: On July 21, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued its final environmental impact statement (FEIS) for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) project, which will transport up to 1.5 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas to Virginia and North Carolina. The FEIS found that the ACP would have adverse impacts on waterbodies, some vegetation, and several endangered species, most if not all of which could be reduced to less than significant levels with avoidance/minimization/mitigation efforts.

Oil

    • Shift in Energy Trade with Mexico Drives Additional Cross-Border Pipeline Authorizations: On June 29, 2017, the State Department announced the issuance of three Presidential permits for pipelines to transport petroleum products cross-border into Mexico. One permit authorizes a new pipeline and the others authorize the expansion of products transported into Mexico by two pipelines owned by NuStar Logistics. These pipeline authorizations are reflective of a recent shift in the balance of energy trade between the U.S. and Mexico. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports that between 2006 – 2010 U.S. energy imports from Mexico were double to triple U.S. energy exports to Mexico, whereas last year U.S. energy exports to Mexico far outpaced U.S. imports from Mexico – $20.2 billion vs. $8.7 billion. Congress currently is considering modifying the process for approval of cross-border energy infrastructure projects. Congress has not issued required procedures for permitting cross-border energy infrastructure. H.R. 2883: Promoting Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure Act would replace the Presidential Permit process, established through Executive Order, with a Congressionally mandated process to authorize cross-border facilities into Mexico and Canada for the import/export of oil and natural gas and electricity transmission. H.R. 2883 was sent by Committee to the full House for consideration on June 28, 2017 and was passed by the full House on July 19th. It has been sent to the Senate for consideration.

    • Federal Courts Do Not Have Authority to Enforce EPA’s Duty to Evaluate the Impact of Clean Air Act Regulations on Employment: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to “conduct continuing evaluations of potential loss or shifts of employment which may result from the administration or enforcement of the [CAA],” including in particular, threatened plant closures or reductions in employment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in Murray Energy Corp. v. Admin. of EPA, Nos. 16-2432, 17-1093, 17-1170 (4th Cir. June 29, 2017) that this CAA requirement does not create a non-discretionary duty that is subject to judicial oversight. The Fourth Circuit reasoned that, while CAA § 304(a)(2) permits anyone to sue the EPA administrator “where there is alleged a failure of the Administrator to perform any act or duty under [the CAA] which is not discretionary with the Administrator,” the statute’s requirement for continuous evaluation without the imposition of guidelines, timelines, or required procedures gives the EPA “considerable discretion” to manage that duty. Accordingly, the court found that there is no discrete duty that is reviewable by the courts under § 304(a)(2).
    • FERC’s Approval of PJM Capacity Market Rule Modifications Rendering Energy Market Rules Unjust and Unreasonable OK: Can the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approve modifications to capacity market rules if those modifications will render the existing energy market rules unjust and unreasonable? The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with FERC’s position that the agency may approve capacity market changes and simultaneously adjust the energy market rules that are implicated to ensure they remain just and reasonable. In Advanced Energy Management Alliance v. FERC, No. 16-1234 (D.C. Cir. June 20, 2017), PJM sought to modify its capacity market rules to enhance the enforcement mechanisms in place to ensure that participants who committed to provide capacity followed through on those commitments when electricity was needed. In conjunction with PJM’s petition to revise the capacity market rules, PJM petitioned FERC to modify several energy market rules that would be rendered unjust and unreasonable with the approval of the requested capacity market changes. FERC simultaneously approved the capacity market changes and modifications to the energy market rules. Objections were raised to the substance of the capacity market changes themselves, as well as to the fact that FERC approved the capacity market changes even though they made energy market rules unjust and unreasonable. Objectors argued the “PJM had created the factual premise and legal basis for FERC to order a change in rates that PJM could not have unilaterally made,” and the “bootstrapping of results” violated the Federal Power Act (FPA). The D.C. Circuit deferred to FERC’s judgment in upholding the approved capacity market changes and in finding that FERC did not run afoul the FPA by simultaneously approving the changes to both markets.

U.S. Dept. of the Interior

    • Comments Sought on New Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program – North Carolina Says No to Seismic Testing: On July 3, 2017, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management published in the Federal Register a request for information and comments on the development of a new national program for offshore oil and gas leasing on the outer continental shelf (OCS). When completed, this new 5-year program for 2019-2024 will replace the National OCS Program for 2017-2022, which was approved on January 17, 2017 under the previous administration. The 45-day comment period will end August 17, 2017. On July 20th, North Carolina Governor Cooper announced that the state would be submitting official comments opposing seismic testing for offshore oil drilling off the coast of North Carolina in a related regulatory proceeding. “[N]ot off our coast” was Governor Cooper’s declaration.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    • President Trump Selects New FERC Chairman, Kevin J. McIntyre: On July 14, 2017, President Trump announced his intention to appoint Kevin J. McIntyre to serve on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as the new Chairman. McIntyre will fill the void left by former chairman Norman Bay, who resigned effective February 2017. The President also announced his intent to nominate Richard Glick to the Commission at the end of June. FERC has been without a quorum of Commission members since February of this year. These final two nominees would restore the agency’s full slate of Commission members. The President’s first two nominees, Chatterjee and Powelson, were advanced by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in early June and await full Senate confirmation.

In our dynamic global energy market, data is king and leading-edge information is a critical input for the development of sound policy and business strategies. We highlight several resources that recently have been made available and reflect up-to-date insight into industry data and market fluctuations:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

    • 2017 Summer Energy Market and Reliability Assessment: On June 15, 2017, FERC released its 2017 Summer Energy Market and Reliability Assessment report, presented by the agency’s Office of Electric Reliability and the Office of Enforcement. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) anticipates that there will be sufficient power to meet the reference margin levels in most areas assessed, with both total load and generating capacity forecasted to be up about 1 % from last year. Solar and wind capacity are expected to exceed last year’s levels and to constitute most of the capacity additions for the summer. Natural gas prices currently exceed that of coal and are expected to exceed those from last summer. FERC reports that the $5 billion+ of infrastructure upgrades that became operational in the six RTO/ISO markets since last summer may alleviate some grid congestion and the corresponding price volatility this summer.

Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    • U.S. Natural Gas Imports & Exports Report: On June 29, 2017, the EIA released its U.S. Natural Gas Imports & Exports 2016 report analyzing the state of U.S. natural gas production, imports, and exports. In 2015, the U.S. reached record levels of natural gas production, which were largely sustained through 2016 with only a 2% reduction. With U.S. natural gas production levels nearly 40% above a decade ago, 2016 natural gas net imports hit a record low and natural gas exports last year were more than triple those of a decade ago. Record U.S. natural gas production is expected to propel the country to the status of a net exporter of natural gas in 2018.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Moore & Van Allen PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Moore & Van Allen PLLC
Contact
more
less

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.