Emerging Insurance Disputes -- An Insured’s Obligation To Reimburse Its Insurer For Costs Expended In The Defense Of Non-Covered Claims



One of the most vexing issues a liability insurer confronts is the question of defending an arguably covered claim against its insured. Most jurisdictions support, if not encourage, an insurer’s decision to provide the insured with a defense subject to a reservation of its rights to later decline coverage if eventually warranted. The approach has benefits for both the insured and the insurer. It provides the insured with a defense and protects the insurer from arguably defaulting on its duty to provide a defense while enabling both parties to explore the coverage without prejudicing their respective positions.

The question of whether an insured is obligated to reimburse its insurer for defense costs expended by the insurer in the defense of an underlying litigation after there has been a determination of no coverage and no duty to defend is a common one.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Duane Morris LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »