Employee Did Not Have Duty To Intervene To Stop Fight: Court

more+
less-
more+
less-

Does an on-shift-employee have a duty to intervene to stop a fight between members of the public – or between other employees?  A recent court decision provides some guidance on that issue.

Madam Justice Beth Allen of the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) decided that a bus driver was not required to intervene to stop a fight between two bus passengers.  She dismissed a negligence suit against the driver.

The two passengers got into an “altercation” on a bus.  The incident started when one passenger bumped the other while moving toward the back of the bus. Angry words ensued which led to them grabbing each other and the plaintiff falling to the floor and being injured.  The injured passenger sued both the Toronto Transit Commission and the driver.  The TTC and the driver moved to have the lawsuit thrown out, arguing that there was no genuine issue of fact requiring a trial.

The court stated that the “Security for Bus Operators” manual prohibits a driver from intervening physically in a fight because of the risk of physical injury and the risk of being charged with assault.  It was also up to the driver’s judgment as to whether to verbally tell the fighters to stop.  Here, the bus driver acted reasonably by stopping the bus and putting it out of service.

In short, the plaintiff had not proven that the TTC or driver were negligent   The lawsuit was dismissed.

According to this decision, the employee was not required to intervene to stop a fight since doing so could have put himself in harm’s way.

Clarke v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 ONSC 2287 (CanLII)

- See more at: http://www.occupationalhealthandsafetylaw.com/employee-did-not-have-duty-to-intervene-to-stop-fight-court#sthash.daq1cQjx.dpuf

 

Does an on-shift-employee have a duty to intervene to stop a fight between members of the public – or between other employees?  A recent court decision provides some guidance on that issue.

Madam Justice Beth Allen of the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) decided that a bus driver was not required to intervene to stop a fight between two bus passengers.  She dismissed a negligence suit against the driver.

The two passengers got into an “altercation” on a bus.  The incident started when one passenger bumped the other while moving toward the back of the bus. Angry words ensued which led to them grabbing each other and the plaintiff falling to the floor and being injured.  The injured passenger sued both the Toronto Transit Commission and the driver.  The TTC and the driver moved to have the lawsuit thrown out, arguing that there was no genuine issue of fact requiring a trial.

The court stated that the “Security for Bus Operators” manual prohibits a driver from intervening physically in a fight because of the risk of physical injury and the risk of being charged with assault.  It was also up to the driver’s judgment as to whether to verbally tell the fighters to stop.  Here, the bus driver acted reasonably by stopping the bus and putting it out of service.

In short, the plaintiff had not proven that the TTC or driver were negligent   The lawsuit was dismissed.

According to this decision, the employee was not required to intervene to stop a fight since doing so could have put himself in harm’s way.

Clarke v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 ONSC 2287 (CanLII)

- See more at: http://www.occupationalhealthandsafetylaw.com/employee-did-not-have-duty-to-intervene-to-stop-fight-court#sthash.daq1cQjx.dpuf

Does an on-shift-employee have a duty to intervene to stop a fight between members of the public – or between other employees?  A recent court decision provides some guidance on that issue.

Madam Justice Beth Allen of the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) decided that a bus driver was not required to intervene to stop a fight between two bus passengers.  She dismissed a negligence suit against the driver.

The two passengers got into an “altercation” on a bus.  The incident started when one passenger bumped the other while moving toward the back of the bus. Angry words ensued which led to them grabbing each other and the plaintiff falling to the floor and being injured.  The injured passenger sued both the Toronto Transit Commission and the driver.  The TTC and the driver moved to have the lawsuit thrown out, arguing that there was no genuine issue of fact requiring a trial.

The court stated that the “Security for Bus Operators” manual prohibits a driver from intervening physically in a fight because of the risk of physical injury and the risk of being charged with assault.  It was also up to the driver’s judgment as to whether to verbally tell the fighters to stop.  Here, the bus driver acted reasonably by stopping the bus and putting it out of service.

In short, the plaintiff had not proven that the TTC or driver were negligent   The lawsuit was dismissed.

According to this decision, the employee was not required to intervene to stop a fight since doing so could have put himself in harm’s way.

Clarke v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 ONSC 2287 (CanLII)

- See more at: http://www.occupationalhealthandsafetylaw.com/employee-did-not-have-duty-to-intervene-to-stop-fight-court#sthash.daq1cQjx.dpuf

Does an on-shift-employee have a duty to intervene to stop a fight between members of the public – or between other employees?  A recent court decision provides some guidance on that issue.

Madam Justice Beth Allen of the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) decided that a bus driver was not required to intervene to stop a fight between two bus passengers.  She dismissed a negligence suit against the driver.

The two passengers got into an “altercation” on a bus.  The incident started when one passenger bumped the other while moving toward the back of the bus. Angry words ensued which led to them grabbing each other and the plaintiff falling to the floor and being injured.  The injured passenger sued both the Toronto Transit Commission and the driver.  The TTC and the driver moved to have the lawsuit thrown out, arguing that there was no genuine issue of fact requiring a trial.

The court stated that the “Security for Bus Operators” manual prohibits a driver from intervening physically in a fight because of the risk of physical injury and the risk of being charged with assault.  It was also up to the driver’s judgment as to whether to verbally tell the fighters to stop.  Here, the bus driver acted reasonably by stopping the bus and putting it out of service.

In short, the plaintiff had not proven that the TTC or driver were negligent   The lawsuit was dismissed.

According to this decision, the employee was not required to intervene to stop a fight since doing so could have put himself in harm’s way.

Clarke v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 ONSC 2287 (CanLII)

Topics:  Canada, Negligence, Public Transit

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »