Employers Beware in Race Discrimination Cases

by Pessin Katz Law, P.A.
Contact

Several recent cases highlight the fact that employers should think twice before failing to properly address a Title VII complaint.  Failing to do so may result in their winding up in a jury trial.  That fact is most recently highlighted by a decision of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals filed April 6, 2015 in a case titled McMullin v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety (No. 14-60366 (USDC, SD Miss.))

McMullin involved an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a complaint in a Title VII race-discrimination case.  According to the opinion: “…plaintiff, Lieutenant Gayle McMullin, presented evidence, which, if believed by a jury, would show a fumbling, bumbling case of determined efforts to deny a promotion to McMullin.  Lieutenant McMullin alleges that the Mississippi Department of Public Safety (“the Department”)…failed to promote her to the position of Training Director and instead promoted a less-qualified officer of lower rank to fill the position, based on race.”

Lt. McMullin was within the protected class of being racially white.  The person who secured the position sought by Lt. McMullin was outside her class, being non-white, as was the decision-maker involved in making the promotional decision.  The court found that the superior responsible for filling the position had presented confusing testimony as to the decision-making process regarding a promotion to the position Lt. McMullin sought and the number of available positions.  The court further found that even though more qualified than the other applicant, Lt. McMullin was denied the opportunity to apply for the position she desired and, therefore, blocked her promotion.

Citing the light burden that the Department had to overcome after Lt. McMullin presented a prima facie case of discrimination, the court found that the Department had failed to do so.  According to the opinion, the Department provided “no discussion, explanation or elaboration of its purported reason(s) for its promotion decision…” other than the bald assertion that it had “…provided a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision to promote [the other candidate]”.  Failure of the Department to do so resulted in the summary judgment ruling in its favor being vacated and remanded to the District Court.

In Hutchens v. Chicago Board of Education, No. 13-3648 (7th Cir. Mar. 24, 2015), Hutchens, a black woman in the Board’s Professional Development Unit,  was laid off from the Unit rather than a white woman, whom Hutchens claimed was retained because the Unit’s director “…preferred whites to blacks.”

The director cited reasons of isolation of Hutchens during meetings leading to less recruitment into the Professional Development Unit’s program; her “bickering” with co-workers; and issues regarding her “tardiness”.  All of this found no or scant documentation in the records of the Board; was contradictory to testimony in the case below; and raised questions about the veracity of the witnesses for the Board.  As a result, the summary judgment granted the Board in the District Court was vacated and remanded as to discrimination under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The Hutchens case points out that even if an employer articulates a purported non-discriminatory reason for its employment decision, it had best document that reason clearly and be prepared to back up the documentation with clearly articulated (and reliable) witness testimony.  Failure to do so may well lead a case back to a jury rather than toward an affirmance of summary judgment.

And, finally, in Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the Courts, No. 13-2212 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 2015), a case in which one would think an “Administrative Office of the Courts” (“AOC”) would know better, a person with the disability of “Social Anxiety Disorder” was terminated three weeks after sending an email to her superior disclosing her disability and requesting an accommodation.  The court’s opinion found that a prima facie case for discriminatory discharge had been made out by Jacobs.

The AOC then offered several “non-discriminatory reasons” for Jacobs’s termination.  The burden then shifted back to Jacobs to show that those reasons were a “pretext” for her termination, and not legitimate reasons for doing so.  The court states:  “Even more striking is that no one at the AOC documented any of the justifications (including those raised at the time of termination) in any way.”  Furthermore, testimony in the case tended not to support the legitimacy of the reasons advanced by the AOC for the termination.

After a lengthy recital of the summary judgment standard in the Fourth Circuit, the court vacated and remanded for trial Jacobs’s ADA disability discrimination, retaliation, and failure to accommodate claims.  The case once again highlights the importance of documentation in discrimination cases and having proper testimony to back them up.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pessin Katz Law, P.A. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pessin Katz Law, P.A.
Contact
more
less

Pessin Katz Law, P.A. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.