Employers May Not Be Entitled to Full Disclosure of Potential EEOC Class Action Before Suit Is Filed

by Franczek Radelet P.C.
Contact

[author: Pete Land]

Employers often expect that, before the EEOC can expand a single-employee EEOC charge into a class action lawsuit, the EEOC must explain the scope of any potential class action and offer an employer the opportunity to resolve it. That expectation is open to question, however, after the Northern District of Illinois’s recent decision in EEOC v. Union Road Towing, Inc. In that case, the Court rejected an employer’s attempt to eliminate an EEOC class action based upon the limited nature of the EEOC’s pre-suit disclosures. Because the Seventh Circuit has not yet resolved this specific issue, the district court’s ruling increases the risk to Illinois employers that the EEOC can turn adverse findings in single-employee charges of discrimination into claims on behalf of an entire class of employees, without first affording the employer an informed opportunity to attempt to resolve such class-wide claims. As explained below, to retain the possibility of pre-lawsuit resolution of such claims and avoid expansive discovery, employers should repeatedly seek clarification of the scope of any potential class action referenced in EEOC reasonable cause determinations or conciliation discussions.

In Union Road Towing, Inc., two employees filed EEOC charges alleging disability discrimination pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After investigating, the EEOC issued a reasonable cause determination that the employer had violated the ADA in three different ways with respect to the two named employees and an unspecified “class of disabled individuals.” The violations included unlawful termination at the end of an unpaid leave of absence and denial of requests for such leave. The EEOC then attempted to conciliate with the employer. During conciliation, however, the EEOC did not clarify the size of the potential class or the specific nature of the potential class claims, despite communications from the employer indicating its understanding of the scope of the potential litigation. In particular, the employer believed the class members were limited to a few individuals who had been denied leave and did not include anyone who had been terminated. Based upon that understanding, the employer found the EEOC’s $2 million settlement demand excessive and refused to offer a counter. The EEOC’s subsequent lawsuit alleged termination claims on behalf of 17 additional class members. The employer sought summary judgment with respect to the additional plaintiffs, arguing that the EEOC failed to adhere to Title VII’s administrative requirements by not investigating their claims or engaging in good-faith conciliation efforts about such claims.

With respect to the scope of the EEOC’s investigation, the Court ruled conclusively that Seventh Circuit precedent precluded court review of the EEOC’s determination that its investigation sufficiently supported claims advanced in subsequent litigation. This decision was consistent with existing law. As to conciliation, the court acknowledged that existing law was less clear and agreed with the employer that the EEOC had failed “to clarify its position after receiving communication from [the employer] indicating that there was a misunderstanding concerning the scope of the conciliation.” However, because the employer also contributed to the miscommunication by disengaging in the settlement discussion instead of seeking additional clarification, the Court allowed the EEOC to pursue claims on behalf of the 17 additional class members.

Although there is no Seventh Circuit law determining this issue, the decision in EEOC v. Union Road Towing, Inc. contradicts an Eighth Circuit decision issued one week earlier that protected employers against similar class action litigation. In EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc., the EEOC sought to expand federal court litigation to include claims on behalf of employees who were not parties to the underlying EEOC charges. The Eighth Circuit granted summary judgment for the employer and eliminated the additional class claims because the EEOC had not investigated and attempted to conciliate such claims before filing suit. Part of the Eighth Circuit’s rationale was that the EEOC should be limited from using federal-court discovery to substantiate violations beyond those uncovered by the EEOC’s pre-litigation investigation and included in pre-suit conciliation discussions.

Until the Seventh Circuit or the United States Supreme Court adopts the employer-friendly approach used in the Eighth Circuit, employers in Illinois (and possibly elsewhere in the Seventh Circuit) should not rely on vague pre-suit references by the EEOC to potential class action claims as a basis for eliminating such litigation. Instead, employers should confirm the scope of any potential class claims before breaking off conciliation discussions to ensure that they are able to assess the potential risks of litigation.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Franczek Radelet P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Franczek Radelet P.C.
Contact
more
less

Franczek Radelet P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!