Employment, Labor and Benefits/Appellate Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Scores One for Employers in "Mixed-Motives" Age Discrimination Cases

more+
less-

On June 18, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., No.08-441, which significantly changes the evidence necessary to prove an age discrimination claim. The Court held that “a plaintiff must prove that age was the "but for" cause of the employer's adverse decision” to “establish a disparate-treatment claim under” the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the ADEA). In doing so, the Court rejected case law holding that a plaintiff could prevail in an ADEA action by establishing that age played a motivating part in an adverse employment decision. This holding represents a departure from existing precedent, and favors employers by making it more difficult for employees to prevail on an ADEA claim.

Please see full alert for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mintz Levin - Employment Matters | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »