Employment Law Blog: Declined Invitation - The Iowa Supreme Court Holds its Ground on Punitive Damages


The Iowa Supreme Court declined an invitation to reverse itself and find that the Iowa Civil Rights Act allows recovery of punitive damages. The Court ruled Iowa’s civil rights laws have never allowed recovery of punitive damages, and will not change that position now. The Court originally ruled on this issue 27 years ago. Since the Iowa Supreme Court’s initial holding in 1986, hopeful litigants have invited Courts, both state and federal, to circumvent this general rule and recover punitive damages. According to the Court, the inability to recover punitive damages is “ingrained” in Iowa’s legal culture. However, the plaintiffs in Friday’s case, Ackelson v. Manley Toy Direct, L.L.C., pointed out, in reality, whether a plaintiff recovers punitive damages varies considerably. Some Iowa courts allow plaintiffs to recover punitive damages when that plaintiff’s civil rights are violated by an employer—others don’t.

Plaintiffs urged that the law was unsettled and deserved reexamination. The plaintiffs believed that it was time for the law to change, particularly since the Court’s 2005 decision to let plaintiffs try their cases to juries. The plaintiffs argued that if a jury is allowed under Iowa’s Civil Rights Act, then punitive damages should be too. The Court rejected this argument, criticizing the plaintiffs’ suggestion that the 2005 decision was a “knockout blow” to the existing, settled principles of law.

The Court, examining the precise words chosen by Iowa lawmakers, found no support for the recovery of punitive damages. This is the same analysis taken 27 years ago. The Court reminds Iowans that since 1986, the Iowa Legislature has amended Iowa’s civil rights laws, but did not contradict the Court on the issue of punitive damages. The Legislature chose to take no action, even though the recovery of punitive damages in civil rights case has received broad national attention. The Court ruled that the many years of silence by the Legislature is evidence of approval.

As a result, Plaintiffs who sue for violations of their civil rights, under Iowa law, remain limited to compensatory damages.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Davis Brown Law Firm | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.