Enforcing Judgments in International Law: Campbell v Zimbabwe


International laws and their enforcement are issues of increasing importance in today's world of globalization.

Many civilized nations sign treaties to codify and interpret the international laws that govern their relations. Several sovereign southern African nations signed a treaty creating a quasi-federal international government called the Southern African Development Community ("SADC"). One of the entities created by the SADC Treaty is the SADC Tribunal--a permanent international court similar to the International Court of Justice ("ICJ").

The issue presented here is that the SADC Tribunal has the jurisdictional authority to make binding decisions upon sovereign members of the SADC Treaty, it lacks the executive power to enforce those decisions.

This paper follows the case of Campbell v. Zimbabwe, argued before the SADC Tribunal on a human rights claim, in an effort to present the subject of international law and the difficulties of enforcing judgments against sovereign nations at an introductory level.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jonathan Johnson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Jonathan Johnson on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.