Enforcing Judgments in International Law: Campbell v Zimbabwe


International laws and their enforcement are issues of increasing importance in today's world of globalization.

Many civilized nations sign treaties to codify and interpret the international laws that govern their relations. Several sovereign southern African nations signed a treaty creating a quasi-federal international government called the Southern African Development Community ("SADC"). One of the entities created by the SADC Treaty is the SADC Tribunal--a permanent international court similar to the International Court of Justice ("ICJ").

The issue presented here is that the SADC Tribunal has the jurisdictional authority to make binding decisions upon sovereign members of the SADC Treaty, it lacks the executive power to enforce those decisions.

This paper follows the case of Campbell v. Zimbabwe, argued before the SADC Tribunal on a human rights claim, in an effort to present the subject of international law and the difficulties of enforcing judgments against sovereign nations at an introductory level.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, International Trade Updates, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jonathan Johnson | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »