Environmental Enforcement Actions: How Are Civil Penalties Calculated?

more+
less-

(Originally published at: http://illinoisenvironmentallaw.com/cleanup/enforcement-actions-how-are-civil-penalties-calculated/)

I am often asked by owners and executives of manufacturers and other companies to calculate the amount of penalty that their organization will face as a result of an environmental violation. Often, there is a maximum penalty provided by statute, and then statutes, regulations, case law, and/or policy guidance help determine how the penalty actually will be calculated.

A good example of this is the Illinois Pollution Control Board's recent decision in People v. Ward, Case No. PCB 10-72. This case involved improper disposal of electrical transformers and spills of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-laden oil. The Board previously granted the State's motion for summary judgment (click here for my analysis of that prior opinion). In this new opinion, the Board found, under Section 42(a) and (b) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (the "Act"), that the total maximum penalty that could be assessed against each of the defendants was $3.9 million.

After analyzing the relevant factors, the Board found that penalties of $5,000 and $7,000 were appropriate:

"The record contains no evidence of what if any economic benefit accrued, but does provide evidence that Byrom Ward hired proper professionals to assist in remediation. However, the record demonstrates that Timothy James did not participate in the remediation of the site. The record also establishes that hazardous contaminants were released, but no evidence of the impact of that release has been provided. Based on this record, the Board is convinced that a civil penalty is appropriate; however the penalty sought by the People as to Byrom Ward does not sufficiently account for his remediation activities. The Board finds that a civil penalty of $3,500 is appropriate for Byrom Ward as such a penalty will recoup any economic benefit accrued and will deter future violations. However, the Board also finds that a civil penalty of $7,000, twice the penalty assessed against Byrom Ward, is appropriate for Timothy James in light of his failure to assist in any subsequent compliance. A civil penalty of $7,000 will recoup any economic benefit accrued by Timothy James and will deter future violations. Therefore the Board finds that Byrom Ward must pay a civil penalty of $3,500 and Timothy James must pay a civil penalty of $7,000. To reiterate, Byrom Ward’s penalty is less due to the mitigating factor of obtaining subsequent compliance."

At the end of the day, civil penalties are calculated based on an analysis of factors found in statutes, regulations, case law, and/or policy guidance. During this analysis, very large maximum penalties can become much smaller, depending on the facts of the case.

Stay tuned to the Illinois Environmental Law Blog for more news and developments. To subscribe to this blog and sign up for my free newsletter, go to http://illinoisenvironmentallaw.com/subscribe/. To set up a free initial consultation to discuss your legal matter, please contact Chicago environmental attorney Dave Scriven-Young at (312) 239-9722 or dscriven-young@pecklaw.com.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Environmental Updates, Toxic Torts Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dave Scriven-Young, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »