Esquenazi Appeal Confirms the Broad Reach of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

by NAVEX Global
Contact

In last month’s closely watched Esquenazi decision, a U.S. court of appeal weighed in on the definition of “instrumentality” under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for the first time. The case—an appeal to the 11th Circuit—involved the upholding of the ruling in United States v Esquenazi, in which the longest ever individual sentence for violating the FCPA was handed down when two executives were sentenced for scheming to bribe government officials.

Three Key Elements of the Ruling

1) The Interpretation of “Instrumentality”

This case marked the first time an appellate court has addressed the question of who is a foreign official under the FCPA.

The FCPA defines foreign official as “any officer or employees of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof.”  

In the appellate opinion, an instrumentality under the FCPA was defined as “an entity controlled by the government of a foreign country that performs a function the controlling government treats as its own.”  

2) Determining Government Control

The court ruled that what constitutes “control” is a question to be determined depending on the particular facts of the case at issue. However it suggested looking at the following factors:

  • Foreign government’s formal designation of that entity
  • Whether the government has a majority interest
  • Government’s ability to hire and fire the entity’s principals
  • Extent to which the entity’s profits, if any, go directly into the governmental treasury,
  • Extent to which the government funds the entity if it fails to break even
  • Length of time these indicia have existed

3) Determining Whether an Entity is Performing a Governmental Function  

In deciding if an entity performs a function the government treats as its own, the court suggested examining:

  • Whether the entity has a monopoly over the function it exists to carry out
  • Whether the government subsidizes the costs associated with the entity providing services
  • Whether the entity provides services to the public at large in the country
  • Whether the public and the government of that foreign country generally perceive the entity to be performing a governmental function.

Implications for Future FCPA Cases

While this ruling does not create a major change since it essentially upholds the lower court rulings and DOJ Guidance, the Esquenazi appeal supports the proposition that FCPA violations can be triggered even when illegal payments are not offered to a foreign official.

It is now more clear than ever that the FCPA can be violated when someone is bribed who, although not a government official, may be an “instrumentality” of the government. For example, money paid to executives or employees of hospitals in communist countries, which may be owned in large part by the government, could result in a company falling afoul of the FCPA provisions.

Failure to operate within the boundaries of the FCPA can result in significant reputational damage, along with the more tangible threat of fines, penalties—and in some cases disbarment from bidding on future work.

There is now an even stronger argument for organizations to ensure that their policies and training on bribery and corruption are broad enough to define and prohibit bribes or questionable payments to employees of instrumentalities of foreign governments.

Download our white paper A Holistic Approach to Anti-Corruption Compliance for insights into building an effective anti-corruption compliance program.

- See more at: http://www.navexglobal.com/blog/2014/06/04/esquenazi-appeal-confirms-broad-reach-foreign-corrupt-practices-act-fcpa#sthash.pGrO8giM.dpuf

In last month’s closely watched Esquenazi decision, a U.S. court of appeal weighed in on the definition of “instrumentality” under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for the first time. The case—an appeal to the 11th Circuit—involved the upholding of the ruling in United States v Esquenazi, in which the longest ever individual sentence for violating the FCPA was handed down when two executives were sentenced for scheming to bribe government officials.

Three Key Elements of the Ruling

1) The Interpretation of “Instrumentality”

This case marked the first time an appellate court has addressed the question of who is a foreign official under the FCPA.

The FCPA defines foreign official as “any officer or employees of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof.”  

In the appellate opinion, an instrumentality under the FCPA was defined as “an entity controlled by the government of a foreign country that performs a function the controlling government treats as its own.”  

2) Determining Government Control

The court ruled that what constitutes “control” is a question to be determined depending on the particular facts of the case at issue. However it suggested looking at the following factors:

  • Foreign government’s formal designation of that entity
  • Whether the government has a majority interest
  • Government’s ability to hire and fire the entity’s principals
  • Extent to which the entity’s profits, if any, go directly into the governmental treasury,
  • Extent to which the government funds the entity if it fails to break even
  • Length of time these indicia have existed

3) Determining Whether an Entity is Performing a Governmental Function  

In deciding if an entity performs a function the government treats as its own, the court suggested examining:

  • Whether the entity has a monopoly over the function it exists to carry out
  • Whether the government subsidizes the costs associated with the entity providing services
  • Whether the entity provides services to the public at large in the country
  • Whether the public and the government of that foreign country generally perceive the entity to be performing a governmental function.

Implications for Future FCPA Cases

While this ruling does not create a major change since it essentially upholds the lower court rulings and DOJ Guidance, the Esquenazi appeal supports the proposition that FCPA violations can be triggered even when illegal payments are not offered to a foreign official.

It is now more clear than ever that the FCPA can be violated when someone is bribed who, although not a government official, may be an “instrumentality” of the government. For example, money paid to executives or employees of hospitals in communist countries, which may be owned in large part by the government, could result in a company falling afoul of the FCPA provisions.

Failure to operate within the boundaries of the FCPA can result in significant reputational damage, along with the more tangible threat of fines, penalties—and in some cases disbarment from bidding on future work.

There is now an even stronger argument for organizations to ensure that their policies and training on bribery and corruption are broad enough to define and prohibit bribes or questionable payments to employees of instrumentalities of foreign governments.

Download our white paper A Holistic Approach to Anti-Corruption Compliance for insights into building an effective anti-corruption compliance program.

 

Written by:

NAVEX Global
Contact
more
less

NAVEX Global on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.