EU Judges Rising To The Challenge? The EU General Court’s judgments in Hydrogen Peroxide, Netherlands Beer and International Removals Services


There is a growing debate as to the standard of review that the EU courts apply when reviewing European Commission (‘Commission’) decisions in competition law cases. It has been argued that many recent judgments of the EU Courts have essentially done no more than verify whether the Commission had acted within its ascribed competence, and that this deferential intensity of judicial review is constitutionally inadequate.

However, a series of judgments handed down by the General Court of the European Union (‘GC’) on 16 June 2011 suggests that EU judges may now be rising to the challenge and showing themselves willing to exercise the level of judicial scrutiny arguably required of them, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, by the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Not only did the GC reduce the fines on a number of companies, but for the first time ever, the Commission was held not to be entitled to rely on the presumption that a parent company was liable for the anticompetitive conduct of a wholly-owned subsidiary.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


White & Case LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.