EU Timber Regulations - How Robust Are Your Due Diligence Systems?

Allen & Overy LLP
Contact

Whilst the European Timber Regulation dates back to 2010, it only took direct effect in Member States last year. Amongst other things, it requires operators to ensure they have due diligence systems in place to properly manage the risks of acquiring timber (or products derived from timber) which has been illegally harvested.

A mixed picture is emerging as companies affected seek to put in place due diligence systems to address complex supply chain risks. As the regime is bedding down across Europe, now is a good time to ask whether you have a due diligence system in place that fully meets the requirements of the Regulation and addresses the specific risks arising for your supply chains.

Whilst the European Timber Regulation dates back to 2010, it only took direct effect in Member States last year. Amongst other things, it requires operators to ensure they have due diligence systems in place to properly manage the risks of acquiring timber (or products derived from timber) which has been illegally harvested.

A mixed picture is emerging as companies affected seek to put in place due diligence systems to address complex supply chain risks. As the regime is bedding down across Europe, now is a good time to ask whether you have a due diligence system in place that fully meets the requirements of the Regulation and addresses the specific risks arising for your supply chains.

EUTR overview

The European Timber Regulation (995/2010) (EUTR) forms a cornerstone in the EU’s policy to tackle illegal logging and associated trades. It aims to develop greater supply chain transparency and more responsible trading practices in order to reduce illegal deforestation.

The EUTR imposes a:

• general prohibition on any person placing illegally harvested timber and timber products on the EU market;
• duty on anyone placing timber products on the EU market for the first time (Operators) to have and implement a due diligence system; and
• duty on anyone trading timber products that are already on the EU market (Traders) to keep information to enable the traceability of products back through the supply chain.
Whether or not timber is illegally harvested is judged in accordance with the applicable legislation of the country of harvest.

It is important that all businesses that use, import or trade in timber products (which includes packaging) are:
• aware of their EUTR obligations and the potential implications of non-compliance;
• continually reviewing the content and implementation of their due diligence and document management systems to ensure that they are up to European Commission and Member State expectations; and
• aware of upcoming changes to the EUTR, including expansions of its scope to include a broader range of timber and paper products.

What timber products are caught?

The EUTR’s general prohibition applies to certain listed “timber and timber products”. The due diligence and traceability duties will similarly fall on any person trading in such “timber and timber products”. The list of timber and timber products is extensive and relies on specific product code classifications but as a general rule will include:

• rough or shaped wood, including building, joinery and wooden furniture;
• sheets for veneering and laminated wood;
• particle board, fibreboard, and plywood;
• certain pulp and paper products;
• packaging products including packing cases, boxes, crates and pallets but excluding packaging supporting/protecting another product; and
• fuel wood (including wood chips, logs and sawdust).

Timber and timber products which have been recovered and/or recycled from waste in accordance with European waste law are out of scope. The EUTR also specifically provides that timber products that are covered by certain licences and permits (namely, FLEGT Licences and CITES Certificates) are considered to be legally harvested and therefore meet the requirements of the EUTR.

Your Due Diligence Systems

The EUTR imposes an obligation on Operators (being entities who place timber or timber products on the European market for the first time) to have and implement a formal due diligence system (DDS). There are three basic elements of a DDS prescribed by the EUTR:

1. Access to information procedures:

The DDS should include documented procedures for collection and recording of key information. The key information required to be obtained is listed in the EUTR and includes not only specific information related to the timber itself (such as a description of the species and geographic region of harvest), but also more general information to provide a context for assessing the product.

2. Risk assessment procedures:

The DDS must contain measures and procedures to determine the risk of timber products containing illegally harvested timber. The EUTR does not prescribe a risk assessment procedure and the factors relevant to any assessment will vary from case to case. Certain key factors in a risk assessment include the prevalence of illegal harvesting in the source country level of governance in that country and the complexity of the supply chain. The ultimate outcome of the assessment is to determine whether there is a ‘negligible’ or more than negligible risk that the product may comprise illegally harvested timber. The risk will only be negligible where no cause for concern is revealed on the basis of the key information gathered.

3. Risk mitigation procedures:

Where the risk assessment procedure results in a more than negligible risk assessment, adequate and proportionate risk mitigation measures are required to be taken to minimise the risk of illegally harvested timber being placed on the EU market. Appropriate risk mitigation measures will depend on the particular case but may include obtaining further information about a supplier or seeking third party verification.

All Operators should have a DDS, in compliance with the above, in place. The exact formulation of a DDS is left to the operator although further rules on the DDS are set out in the European Commission’s Implementing Regulation . Alternatively, Operators may choose to utilise the services of an approved ‘monitoring organisation’ that provides a DDS and verifies its proper use by Operators. Such monitoring organisations are also required to take action in the event of failure by an operator to properly use the DDS provided by the monitoring organisation, that may include the notification of such failures to the competent authority.

However, the EUTR obligations do not stop at the implementation of the DDS. Operators must maintain and regularly evaluate the DDS. The European Commission has issued guidance stating that good practice dictates that this review and evaluation process should be undertaken annually by a party who is independent from the implementation of the DDS and should identify weaknesses and failures of the DDS together with deadlines for the correction of such issues. The European Commission has further suggested that the review should not only include an assessment of the DDS procedures but also the actual implementation of the DDS and the knowledge of those persons responsible for the implementation of, and compliance, with the DDS.

Traders’ duties: traceability

If you buy or sell timber or timber products already placed on the EU market you will be classified as a Trader under the EUTR. There is no limit to how far down the supply chain these obligations apply. Therefore, any person trading in timber or timber products will be a Trader.

Traders are required to identify:

• the operators or traders who have supplied the timber and timber products to them; and

• where applicable, other persons (who will also be Traders) to whom they supply timber and timber products.
Traders must keep such information for at least five years. There is no specific obligation for Traders to undertake any diligence into the timber products they work with (that obligation sits with the person who brings the product into the EU). As a matter of their broader compliance programmes, Traders may want to go further in requesting confirmation from their suppliers of compliance with the main restrictions in the EUTR.

Upcoming revision of the EUTR

The European Commission is required to undertake regular reviews of the EUTR. The first such review must take place by 3 December 2015. In the 2015 review the European Commission must:

• consider Member States’ reporting on and experience with the application of the EUTR;

• review the functioning and effectiveness of the EUTR, including in preventing illegally harvested timber or timber products derived from such timber being placed on the EU market;

• consider the administrative consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises; and

• consider extending the coverage of the EUTR to other timber products (including, specifically, printed books, newspapers, brochures, commercial catalogues, leaflets and similar printed matter or products of the printing industry).

The European Commission is in the process of preparing consultation materials to support a consultation process regarding the 2015 review.

Comments

A mixed picture is emerging as to how businesses caught by the EUTR have implemented the DDS requirements. Now that the regime has had time to bed-down, and in light of the on-going obligations to monitor, it is a good time to consider:

• Whether your due diligence systems are in place?

• How any DDS is working in practice – who is responsible for implementation and is its effectiveness being monitored?

• Whether you are receiving the right level of information from suppliers? If not, what mitigation measures are in place (including contractual representations as to product sourcing)?

• Whether it is sufficient to simply rely on FLEGT and/or CITES certificates?

The 2015 review should also be carefully monitored. It is possible that the scope of the regime will be widened to include other timber-based products. A significant step would be to include packaging containing other products although it’s too early to say whether this will be adopted. However, the direction of travel is clear.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen & Overy LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen & Overy LLP
Contact
more
less

Allen & Overy LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide