European IP Bulletin - Issue 83, August/September 2011

more+
less-

In This Issue:

Article 29 Working Party Opinion On The Definition of Consent: An Unambiguous View of The Future; Ranbaxy v AstraZeneca: Skilled Persons; The Money Saving Expert Protects Distinctive Trade Marks; Fashion Designer Allowed to Prevent Use of Name Despite Selling All Rights; Geographical Indications Not Automatically Protected under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and Rules; Users and Consumers; US Copyright Alert System: A Model for Europe?; Digital Copyright Exchange; Green Paper on Online Distribution of Audiovisual Works; Commission Publishes Responses to Consultation on Enforcement of IP Rights; The Information Commissioner’s Office Draft Guidance on Monetary Penalties; and Prize-Draw Competitions Referred to The Court of Justice of The European Union.

Article 29 Working Party Opinion On The Definition of Consent: An Unambiguous View of The Future

On 13 July 2011, the Article 29 Working Party published Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent (WP 187) for the purposes of processing personal data in the European Union. The opinion provides a thorough analysis of the concept of consent as currently used in the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) and the amended e-Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC).

Please see full bulletin below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

McDermott Will & Emery on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×