# Even When You Expect To Win The Value Of Your Suit May Be Negative

more+
less-

In prior posts, I’ve written about risk. See To The SEC, ‘Risk’ Is A Four Letter Word“. In my view, risk should be understood as the product of the probabilities of a range of outcomes and the consequences of those outcomes. In assessing risk, both positive and negative outcomes should be considered. Yesterday, I wrote about surprising legal holdings in Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc., 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1202 (Nov. 20, 2012). The case presents an interesting risk analysis scenario.

The plaintiff sued for only about \$66,000 and the defendant paid its lawyers \$150,000 to defend this claim. Let’s assume that the plaintiff paid a lesser amount in legal fees to prosecute its claim – \$100,000. If we assume that the court could have awarded anything between \$0 and \$66,000, then the plaintiff’s risk would have been the probability of each award multiplied by the amount. To keep things simple, let’s assume the plaintiff believes that only three positive outcomes are possible:

 Probability Outcome Expected Return (Risk) .1 \$10,000 \$1,000 .1 \$25,000 \$2,500 .4 \$66,000 \$26,400 Total Expected Return: \$29,900

If we assume that the probability of the plaintiff being awarded its attorneys’ fees is equal to the overall risk of prevailing on the contract (i.e., the plaintiff will receive 100% of its attorneys’ fees if it obtains any of the three possible awards), then we should add another \$60,000 (.6*\$100,000). The plaintiff’s overall positive risk is \$89,900. But we must also account for the possible negative outcomes. By the plaintiff’s own reckoning, it has a 40% chance of not receiving any award (i.e., losing on the contract). If it loses, it will pay 100% of its attorneys’ fees (\$100,000) and there is a risk that the court will award the defendant its attorney’s as well, as happened in the actual case. The expected loss is \$100,000 ((.4 *\$100,000) + (.4*\$150,000)). The plaintiff’s expected return under these assumptions is -\$10,100. Although the plaintiff’s expected return is a loss, pursuing the litigation would result in a smaller expected loss than doing nothing.

If we assume that the defendant shares the same conclusions about the probable outcomes, the expected damage award will be \$29,900. If the defendant loses, it will also have to pay the plaintiff’s and its own attorneys. The probability of this occurring is \$150,000 ((.6*\$100,000) + (.6*\$150,000)). Thus, the expected return for the defendant is -\$179,900.

This example is, of course, based on arbitrary assumptions that I’ve made for the sake of illustration. It also greatly simplifies the problem. Nonetheless, I present it as an illustration of how to think about risk.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

more+
less-

## "My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×