Ex Parte Contacts


In Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in Black Hills Media, LLC, IPR2014-00717 Papers 6 and 7, IPR2014-00735, Papers 8 and 9 (July 10, 2014), the patent owner sent an improper email to the Board.  In response, the petitioner send an improper reply email to the Board.  The Board instructed that the proper way to address an improper contact with the Board:

If counsel becomes concerned about unauthorized filings by an opponent, counsel should request a conference with the Board. A substantive e-mail response is not appropriate and will not be considered. Any further such filings by either party will likely result in sanctions.


Topics:  Email, Ex-Parte Communications, Patent Litigation, Patents, Samsung

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »