FCPA Settlement Agreements, Monitors and Self Monitoring


This article explores an apparent trend of the DOJ less frequently requiring Independent Corporate Monitors as part of their settlement agreements (i.e. deferred prosecution agreements, non-prosecution agreements, administrative agreements, consent agreements, etc.) with organizations. It provides some insight into what may be causing this trend and why it is most likely limited to matters concerning violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The article also briefly explores the concept of "self-monitoring," where an organization self evaluates and reports on their own compliance with the terms of a settlement agreement with a government agency, and why permitting "self-monitoring" should be approached with great caution by the government.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Business Organization Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Government Contracting Updates, International Trade Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© John Hanson, Artifice Forensic Financial Services, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Reporters on Deadline