In yet another key development in the evolution of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) case law, a federal court has denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment in the closely watched United States v. Carson case. This marks the fourth unsuccessful bid by a defendant to challenge the federal regulators’ expansive interpretation of “foreign official” under the FCPA. This decision may nevertheless provide future defendants with some much-needed judicial guidance—and possibly assistance—in fighting FCPA
In Carson, the CEO and other executives of Control Components, Inc., a California-based valve manufacturing company, were charged with allegedly paying approximately $4.9 million in corrupt payments to employees of state-owned customers in China, Korea, Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates. The defendants moved to dismiss on the basis that employees of state owned enterprises (“SOEs”) can never be foreign officials under the FCPA. Since a necessary element to prove a violation of the FCPA is that the intended recipient of the corrupt payment be a “foreign official,” defendants contended that the indictment was facially insufficient, and that the case should be dismissed.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Criminal Law Updates, International Law & Trade Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising