FDIC Clarifies Position on Bank Payment Processing for Payday Lenders and High-Risk Merchants

Explore:  Banks FDIC Payday Loans

Last week, the FDIC issued the latest in a series of Financial Institutions Letters dating back to 2008 on the subject of banks managing third-party risk. This most recent FIL deals with payment processing for third-party merchants engaged in higher-risk activities.

The FIL follows earlier guidance in setting forth the FDIC's expectation that banks providing payment processing for such merchants will perform appropriate risk assessments and conduct due diligence and monitoring adequate to ascertain whether the merchants are operating in accordance with applicable law. The FIL is an apparent response to congressional inquiries spurred by reports that the FDIC was actively encouraging banks involved in payment processing to payday lenders to discontinue providing such services. A recent letter from FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg to Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer presaged the issuance of just such an FIL.

Without mentioning payday lending, the FIL—which applies to banks of all sizes, including community banks—emphasizes that banks "that properly manage these relationships and risks are neither prohibited nor discouraged from providing payment processing services to customers operating in compliance with applicable law." Thus, the FIL clarifies that banks can continue to assist payday lenders who have adopted a "state-by-state" model of operation and comply with the laws of the states where their borrowers reside. The FIL does not directly express a view on other models, including "tribal" models used by many online payday lenders.

The FIL asserts that higher-risk activities are typically characterized by high rates of return, high rates of unauthorized transactions, consumer complaints, and regulatory or criminal actions. The FDIC's reference to high rates of return comes amid reports that the Department of Justice is taking the position that rates of return exceeding 3 percent should raise red flags. In our view, any focus on return rates is questionable and overly broad in the context of a product serving a population with serious credit and liquidity problems.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.