FDIC Issues Guidance Concerning Management of Market Risk in a Challenging Interest Rate Environment

The FDIC issue a Financial Institution Letter (“FIL-46-2013”) reminding FDIC-insured state nonmember banks (“Banks”) of the importance of developing and implementing a comprehensive asset-liability and interest rate risk management program that addresses the special challenges of the current interest rate environment.  The FDIC stated that a number of Banks had reported “a significantly liability-sensitive balance sheet position, meaning that a marked increase in interest rates could adversely affect net interest income and, in turn, earnings performance.”  The FDIC cautioned Banks that in a rising interest rate environment liability-sensitive Banks could also experience a deposit run-off and “rate sensitive liabilities may re-price faster than earning assets as coupons on variable rate loans and investments remain below the floor.”

FIL-46-2013 updates the interest rate risk management guidance provided in January 2010 by the FDIC and other Federal financial regulators at a time when interest rates were approaching historic low levels. The January 2010 interagency guidance, entitled “Advisory on Interest Rates Risk Management” was discussed in the January 12, 2010 Financial Services Alert.

In FIL-46-2013, the FDIC discussed its supervisory expectations with respect to a Bank’s interest rate risk management regarding:

  • Board and Management Oversight (asset-liability management should be an ongoing process);
  • Policy Framework and Prudent Exposure Limits (policies and exposure limits should be reviewed at least annually and should formalize the Board’s risk philosophy);
  • Effective Measurement and Monitoring of Interest Rate Risk (use multiple types of data to measure interest rate risk; consider a variety of modeling techniques); and
  • Risk Mitigation Strategies (including hedging positions, embedded optionality and other strategies).

The FDIC further stated that its examiners will consider the amount of unrealized losses in a Bank’s investment portfolio “and the degree to which [Banks] are exposed to the risk of realizing losses from depreciated securities” in the FDIC’s supervisory assessment of a Bank’s capital adequacy and liquidity and in assigning CAMELS ratings to a Bank.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin Procter LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.