February 2013: Entertainment Litigation Update


Second Circuit Steers Away from Strict Copyright Protection in the Photography Arena. According to well-known photographer Janine Gordon, rival photographer Ryan McGinley copied more than 150 of Ms. Gordon’s contemporary images in a series of advertising campaigns in violation of copyright law. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York disagreed. See Gordon v. McGinley, et al., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23273, *2-4 (2d Cir. Nov. 13, 2012). Ms. Gordon has established herself as a major photographer in the art world, with exhibitions at prominent venues, including the Whitney and Hammer museums. Mr. McGinley also has received critical and commercial acclaim in recent years, particularly with respect to a series of advertising campaigns for fellow defendant Levi Strauss. According to Ms. Gordon, the images used in Mr. McGinley’s Levi Strauss campaigns, and exhibited at various defendant galleries, were substantially similar to her copyrighted photographs. Ms. Gordon pointed to examples such as an arm gesture at a right angle in one photograph, and a naked, tattooed body laying at a similar angle in another. Mr. McGinley countered by stressing the differences between his and Gordon’s photographs—such as the use of different colors, clothing and physical appearances. The District Court agreed with Mr. McGinley, finding that there was no substantial similarity as a matter of law because the differences in the works outweighed the similarities. Accordingly, it granted Mr. McGinley’s motion to dismiss. The Second Circuit concurred, holding after a de novo review that the District Court’s dismissal of Ms. Gordon’s federal copyright claims was proper.

The Gordon ruling has special resonance within the arts community, where artists must calibrate new works based on the degree to which those works can contain or reflect content from other artists’ works. The Second Circuit has now indicated a willingness not only to protect visual artists from copyright claims regarding tangentially similar works, but also to dispose of such claims at an early stage in the litigation process.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.