Federal Circuit Grants Mandamus in Biotech Case and Another Patent Case Ordering District Courts to Transfer

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact

This past December, the Federal Circuit held in two separate patent cases, one of which involved biotechnology patents, that district courts had abused their discretion in refusing to transfer the cases out of their districts.   In these cases, In re Biosearch Techs., Inc. v. Eurofins MWG Operon Inc., 2011 WL 6445102 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 22, 2011), and In re Link_A_Media Devices Corp., 602 F.3d 1221 (Fed. Cir. 2011), the Federal Circuit found that the convenience of the witnesses and interests of the forum predominated over the “centrality” of the venue and over plaintiff’s choice of forum, even where the defendant was incorporated in the transferor forum.

Biosearch involved a motion to transfer out of the Eastern District of Texas to the Northern District of California.   In Biosearch, which involved patents directed to fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes, the Federal Circuit found that the district court had erred in refusing to transfer on the grounds that Eastern District of Texas was a “proper central location” for the suit.   2011 WL 6445102 at *1.   The plaintiffs had initially sued only Biosearch, but subsequently expanded the suit to include three additional defendants, including one Texas-based defendant.   The Federal Circuit found that because the Texas-based defendant had agreed not to challenge infringement and had not participated in claim construction, any of its documents located in Texas were not entitled to significant weight in the analysis.   See id. at *2.   Furthermore, because both the plaintiffs and one defendant were headquartered in California, “[i]t cannot be disputed therefore that such venue would have a strong interest in trying this case and be convenient with regard to the location of likely sources of evidence.”   Id. at *2.   The Federal Circuit, evaluating the established transfer factors according to governing Fifth Circuit law, found that the fact that at least 19 witnesses, among them the inventors and prosecuting attorneys, resided in California weighed heavily in favor of transfer.   See id.   Neither party identified any witnesses subject to compulsory process in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas.   See id.   The Federal Circuit emphasized that it had previously found that the “asserted geographical centrality” of a venue “did not outweigh the many aspects of convenience to the defendant” and that it had previously ordered transfer from the plaintiff’s chosen Eastern Texas forum where, as here, there was “a stark contrast in relevance, convenience, and fairness between the two venues.”    Id. at *3.

In Link_A_Media, the petitioner sought to transfer out of the District of Delaware, also to the Northern District of California.   The Federal Circuit, applying governing Third Circuit law, held that the district court had “placed far too much weight on the plaintiff’s choice of forum.”   602 F.3d at 1223.   Here, the defendant’s sole connection to the District of Delaware was its incorporation in Delaware.   The defendant was headquartered in the Northern District of California, where nearly all of its 130 employees worked.   See id. at 1222.   Furthermore, because Delaware was not the plaintiff’s home forum, the Federal Circuit noted that its choice of forum was “entitled to less deference.”   Id. at 1223.   The Federal Circuit found that the district court had erred in relying heavily on the defendant’s state of incorporation, which “is certainly not a dispositive fact in the venue transfer analysis.”   Id. at 1224.   The Federal Circuit also held that the district court erred in failing to consider the convenience of the witnesses and the location of books and records, and in its analysis of the public interest factors.   In particular, the Federal Circuit emphasized that Delaware had no ties to the dispute or to either party, beyond the defendant’s incorporation there.   See id.   The Federal Circuit also stated that the general experience of the transferor forum in hearing and deciding patent cases was irrelevant where there was no co-pending case involving the same patent.   See id.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact
more
less

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.