Federal Circuit Review - Volume 3 | Issue 8 August 2013

more+
less-

In This Issue:

• Cancellation of Claims by PTO Binding on District Court

• Claims Reciting Method Free of an Agent is Invalid Where Patent Does Not Mention Agent

• Defendant Did Not Have Proper Notice of Products Accused of Infringement

- Excerpt from Cancellation of Claims by PTO Binding on District Court:

In Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc., Appeal No. 12-1334, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the district court’s judgment holding Fresenius liable for infringement.

The issues addressed in this case are: 1) when cancellation of claims by the PTO is binding in a district court case, and 2) what constitutes final judgment under res judicata...

Please see full Review below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×