Federal Court: No Judicial Review Of Privacy Commissioner Decision

Explore:  Judicial Review OPC PIPEDA

In Kniss v. The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Federal Court concluded that an investigative decision by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) should not be the subject of judicial review because the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) provides an adequate alternative remedy.

PIPEDA does not provide the OPC with the power to grant binding remedies. As the Federal Court reiterated, the OPC has extensive investigative powers; however, the role of the OPC is ultimately one that is comparable to an ombudsman.

PIPEDA provides a party who is not satisfied with the investigative decision by the OPC may apply to the Federal Court under section 14 of PIPEDA for a remedy, including an award of damages or a compliance order.

In Kniss, the applicant sought to judicially review two findings of the OPC rather than proceed by way of the statutory process under section 14 of PIPEDA. The court concluded that judicial review as not available for the following reasons:

  • Parliament elaborated a clear process involving an investigative component before the OPC and a judicial one before the Federal Court.
  • Judicial proceedings were only to be initiated following the completion of the investigative process before the OPC.
  • The findings of the OPC were not binding on the parties, unlike the judicial process.
  • The OPC must communicate the right of the parties to proceed to Federal Court following the investigative process, which the Court concluded signalled an intention that “applicants pursue this recourse first”.
  • The scope of the recourse under section 14 of PIPEDA and the powers of the Court to make awards was broader under section 14 of PIPEDA than under judicial review.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.