In a rare burst of bankruptcy enthusiasm, the US Supreme Court in June issued two decisions on matters important to the administration of bankruptcy cases.
In re Bellingham, decided June 9, addressed a seemingly esoteric but central issue of bankruptcy court jurisdiction and clarified, at least in part, the court’s 2011 decision in Stern v. Marshall. Clark v. Rameker, decided June 12, determined whether or not inherited IRA accounts are exempt from liquidation under Title 11 and applicable state law, thus clarifying an issue important both to the administration of bankruptcy cases and to estate planning.
This New Hampshire Bar News Article features Bernstein Shur Attorney Jennifer Rood.
Please see full Article below for more Information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Chapter 11, Consumer Bankruptcy, Estate Planning, IRA, Liquidation, SCOTUS, Stern v Marshall
Published In: Bankruptcy Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Bernstein Shur | Attorney Advertising