Federal Trade Secret Legislation Gathers Momentum, But Questions Remain

by Brooks Kushman P.C.
Contact

In many ways, trade secret protection has been the “odd man out” among intellectual property rights. While patents, trademarks, and copyrights are dominated by federal statutes, trade secret rights arise under state law. In addition, while patents, trademarks, and copyrights are subject to federal review and registration, trade secrets lack central administrative regulation. Although the state-law nature of trade secrets has functioned adequately for many years, Congress is considering legislation that would create a new federal civil action for trade secret misappropriation, including broad remedies currently unavailable under state law.

Trade secret law protects a broad range of proprietary information, including processes, formulae, product development plans, and customer information. In order to qualify for protection, the trade secret generally must be in use, must confer an economic advantage to the user, must not be generally known in the industry, and must be the subject of reasonable safeguards to preserve its confidentiality. If those requirements are met, the owner may file suit when a trade secret is acquired, used, or disclosed by improper means, such as by illegal conduct or through the breach of a contractual or other legal duty. Remedies include injunctive relief to prevent actual or threatened misappropriation and damages. Historically, trade secret law developed from common law principles of agency, trusts, and torts and varied widely from state to state. Beginning in the 1980’s, however, states began adopting the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) promulgated by the Uniform Law Commission. Today, the UTSA has been adopted in 47 states. Massachusetts, New York and North Carolina are the only states that have not adopted the uniform act, although a bill to adopt it has been introduced at the Massachusetts State House.

For several years, Congress has been concerned that the current state law system of trade secret rights is inadequate. Critics have pointed out that in many industries, trade secrets are at least as important as patents and copyrights, although the prevalence of trade secrets is less apparent due to their secret nature. In addition, as companies compete in interstate and global trade, state-law systems seemed ill-suited to protect valuable secrets. Finally, Congress has expressed concern about the threat posed by international espionage, including state-sponsored hacking campaigns targeting sensitive industrial information.

The principal federal statute directed to trade secret protection is the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831–1839. The EEA created criminal penalties for trade secret misappropriation, including by a defendant acting as an agent for a foreign power, but did not include a private civil action for damages. Prosecutions under the EEA have been hampered in many cases by concerns that the prosecution process would result in the public disclosure – and thus destruction – of the trade secrets in question. Congress amended the EAA in 2012 to make it clear that the Act applied to trade secrets that were used in, or intended to be used in, products or services in interstate commerce, and to increase the range of available criminal penalties.

Two bills creating a federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation have been introduced in the current Congress and are receiving broad support, although neither was passed by the full House or Senate. The House bill, H.R. 5233, known as the “Trade Secrets Protection Act of 2014,” was introduced by Representative George Holding (R North Carolina) and cosponsored by several representatives. This bill would:

  • Create a private civil action for misappropriation of trade secrets;
  • Create a civil seizure remedy, authorizing a court to enter an ex parte order seizing property necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent the “propagation or distribution” of a misappropriated trade secret. The order would be effective against a person or entity that misappropriated the secret, or was part of a conspiracy to misappropriate the secret.
  • Create other expanded remedies, including allowing a court to order affirmative steps to protect a trade secret subject to misappropriation and to award both compensatory and punitive damages.

The proposed legislation would preserve state trade secret law. The House Judiciary Committee reported H.R. 5233 to the full House on September 17, 2014. A Senate version of the bill, S 2267, known as the “Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2014” was introduced by Senator Christopher A. Coons, (D Delaware) and closely resembles the House bill. S. 267 has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration.

The bills have the support of a number of industry groups concerned about trade secret protection and efforts to combat industrial espionage. On the other hand, some have questioned the usefulness of a federal cause of action, when the current system of state laws seems to be working. Although uneven development and application of trade secret law was an issue prior to the UTSA, 47 states now have adopted the uniform statute with relatively minor variations in a few states. In addition, federal courts are available to adjudicate claims under the UTSA between parties in different states by exercising diversity jurisdiction. Some have argued that adoption of a federal cause of action would erode state activity in the trade secrets area, resulting in a loss of a useful mechanism for experimentation and development of trade secrets law. Furthermore, since a large percentage of trade secret misappropriation cases involve claims against current or former employees, some concern exists that a federal cause of action would lead to further federal court involvement in employment disputes, which traditionally have been resolved by state courts using state law principles.

In addition, some concerns have been expressed about the ex parte seizure provisions in the House and Senate bills, since they could lead to the interruption of business activities involving innocent third parties or the public.

Following the November election, or in the next term, Congress is likely to advance legislation to expand federal enforcement of trade secret rights. The outcome of that activity may create important substantive and strategic issues for companies that protect their valuable proprietary information as trade secrets.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Brooks Kushman P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Brooks Kushman P.C.
Contact
more
less

Brooks Kushman P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!