Fifth Circuit Holds that Texas Public Utility Commission Can Limit Ability of Intermittent Wind Generators to Sell Their Power Under PURPA As "Firm Power," Contrary to FERC and District Court

by Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact

On September 8, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”), in a 2-1 decision, reversed an opinion by the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“District Court”) and held that the Public Utility Commission of Texas (“PUCT”) acted within its discretion and properly implemented a federal regulation under the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”) in a manner that limits the ability of Qualifying Facilities (“QFs”) to enter into a long-term, fixed-price power purchase agreements, known as “PURPA Put Contracts,” with electric utility buyers to QFs that generate “firm power” as defined by the PUCT.  This decision calls into question the ability of intermittent generation resources, such as many wind generation resources, in Texas (and potentially in Louisiana and Mississippi, the two other states in the Fifth Circuit) to sell power under PURPA Put Contracts.   

Under a provision in the federal PURPA regulations issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) “each qualifying facility shall have the option…to provide energy or capacity [to an electric utility] pursuant to a legally enforceable obligation for the delivery of energy or capacity over a specified term…based on either…the [utility’s] avoided costs calculated at the time of delivery[,or]…calculated at the time the obligation is incurred.” 18 C.F.R. § 292.304(d).

PURPA requires states to implement FERC’s PURPA regulations, including the provision quoted above. The PUCT implemented FERC’s regulations by issuing its own regulations, which in part limit the class of QFs that can obtain a legally enforceable obligation to only those QFs that generate “firm power.” The PUCT regulations, in turn, define “firm power” as “power or power-producing capacity that is available pursuant to a legally enforceable obligation for scheduled availability over a specified term” and “non-firm power” as “power provided under an arrangement that does not guarantee scheduled availability, but instead provides for delivery as available.”

The controversy underlying the Fifth Circuit decision involves a group of wind-powered QFs currently owned by Exelon (“Exelon Wind”), which sought to enter into PURPA Put contracts with Southwestern Public Service Company (“SPS”), an electric utility. In May 2009 the PUCT issued an order finding that only when a wind farm can provide firm power as defined by the PUCT may it enter into a legally enforceable obligation (“PUCT Order”). Exelon Wind subsequently submitted a filing at FERC, requesting that FERC (i) declare that the PUCT’s actions were inconsistent with PURPA and FERC’s PURPA regulations and (ii) initiate an enforcement action in federal district court under section 210(h) of PURPA to compel the PUCT to act in a manner consistent with PURPA and FERC’s PURPA regulations.

FERC declined to initiate an enforcement action (thereby permitting Exelon Wind to bring its own action in federal district court), but did issue a declaratory order finding that “the requirement in Texas law that legally enforceable obligations are only available to seller of ‘firm power,’ as defined by Texas law, [is] inconsistent with PURPA and our regulations implementing PURPA, particularly section 292.304(d) of our regulations.” FERC interpreted Section 292.304(d) of its own PURPA regulations as providing every QF, without qualification, the ability to sell its output pursuant to a legally enforceable obligation. Exelon Wind brought its own enforcement action in District Court, which issued an order agreeing with FERC’s reasoning and conclusion in its declaratory order.

In a lengthy review of the District Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the controversy, the Fifth Circuit vacated the District Court’s opinion with respect to Exelon Wind’s challenge of the PUCT Order itself for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fifth Circuit unanimously held the challenge of the PUCT Order to be an “as-applied” challenge, which, under PURPA and applicable judicial precedent, is within the exclusive jurisdiction of state courts.

The Fifth Circuit also unanimously held that Exelon Wind’s challenge of the PUCT regulations regarding which QFs are eligible to obtain a legally enforceable obligation under PURPA was properly before the District Court, as “implementation” challenges under PURPA are within the jurisdiction of federal courts. In considering Exelon Wind’s implementation challenge the Fifth Circuit panel, however, was divided on whether the PUCT regulations are contrary to PURPA and FERC’s PURPA regulations.

The majority, relying heavily on a 2005 decision by the Fifth Circuit (Power Res. Grp. v. Pub. Util. Comm’n, 422 F.3d 231 (5th Cir. 2005)), found that FERC’s regulations grant the states discretion in setting the specific parameters for eligibility to obtain a legally enforceable obligation and that the plain language of the relevant provision in FERC’s PURPA regulations (quoted above) does not require that all QFs be eligible to obtain a legally enforceable obligation. Consequently, the majority deferred to the PUCT’s regulations and the PUCT’s interpretation of FERC’s PURPA regulations and upheld the PUCT’s limitation on eligibility to enter into a legally enforceable obligation to “firm power” resources as a proper implementation of FERC’s PURPA regulations. In doing so, the majority decided to give no deference to FERC’s declaratory order interpreting Section 292.304(d) of its PURPA Regulations as not allowing for a distinction between firm and non-firm generation resources, but instead, found this order to have no more weight than an informal guidance letter (and repeatedly referred to it as “FERC’s Letter”).

The dissent strongly disagreed with the majority and found that the plain language in Section 292.304(d) of FERC’s PURPA regulations, especially the express reference to “each qualifying facility shall have,” requires that every QF be eligible to obtain a legally enforceable obligation. Finding the plain language clear and unambiguous the dissent found it unnecessary to consider whether the PUCT or FERC should be afforded interpretive deference. However, as it is a “hard issue of first impression” the dissent explained why it would find that FERC should be afforded deference in interpreting its own regulation, rather than the PUCT.

The Fifth Circuit’s decision upholding the PUCT regulations limiting those QFs eligible to obtain a legally enforceable obligation to those that can supply firm power, calls into question the ability of intermittent generation resources, including many wind resources, in Texas to enter into PURPA Put Contracts. This decision also calls into question whether the public utility commissions in Louisiana and Mississippi (which are also within the jurisdiction of the Fifth Circuit) can similarly restrict QFs’ ability to enter into PURPA Put Contracts.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.