Fighting an Overstated Mechanic's Lien: A Simpler Solution


In a depressed economy wrought with defaulting developers, a lender in California facing a lien priority challenge should evaluate whether it would be worthwhile to secure a first priority position for its deed of trust through law and motion practice.

California’s case law provides the legal authority that allows a lender to require a mechanic’s lien claimant to establish the validity of a lien by demonstrating that the lien only includes amounts for labor, services and/or materials that were actually used in the construction of the improvement on the parcel upon which the lien was recorded.

Take, for example, the case where a mechanic’s lien claimant constructs improvements for a large-scale commercial development of 10 buildings on separate parcels. The developer, initially well-funded by its construction lender, paid for the necessary improvements to construct and sell off the first four buildings in the commercial project. Buildings five through eight were in various stages of production when the developer ceased to pay all of the mechanic’s bills. The mechanic, usually on a pay schedule that runs 30 days behind work performed, completed the work necessary to complete buildings five through eight before ceasing operations at the site. At the time the mechanic realizes it won’t be paid, the mechanic is owed $1,000,000. The developer sells buildings five through eight, and the construction lender’s deed of trust is partially reconveyed based on a pay-down, through escrow, of the construction loan. The developer goes belly up and the mechanic records its $1,000,000 lien on each and every lot (i.e., one through ten) underlying the commercial buildings for the full value of all unpaid bills. The construction lender, no longer receiving payments on its loan, forecloses on its remaining security (i.e., the partially constructed buildings numbering nine and ten), and the mechanic’s lien is wiped out as to those two parcels. The mechanic is left with a $1,000,000 lien on the lots underlying buildings one through eight, each of which is owned by a third party, and each of which has a purchase money deed of trust recorded against the parcel.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller Starr Regalia | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.