Filing Redacted Briefing Permitted Following Counsel's Motion To Withdraw

more+
less-

Roche Diagnostics GMBH, et al. v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al.

Case Number: 1:04-cv-04046-RJS (Dkt. 175)

In the run-up to trial of five related matters, Enzo's counsel moved to withdraw as counsel of record. The court issued a series of orders permitting the parties to docket redacted versions of letters and briefing related to the attempted withdrawal and possible adjournment of trial. The court said that the parties had overcome the presumption in favor of open records articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).

Related documents:
1:03-03816-RJS (Dkt. 162)
1: 03-cv-08907 (Dkt. 142)
1:03-cv-08907 (Dkt. 146)

 

 

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robins Kaplan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Robins Kaplan LLP is among the nation’s premier trial law firms, with more than 220 attorneys in six... View Profile »


Follow Robins Kaplan LLP:

Reporters on Deadline

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×