FIO Focus, Issue No. 54

by Nelson Brown & Co.
Contact

Devoted to exploring the progress of the modernization of the insurance industry, FIO Focus provides information and insights about the organizations and issues that are driving change and influencing the future of the industry.

Congressional Hearing on FSOC's Designation Process and its Impact on the U.S. Financial System

On May 20, 2014, the Financial Services Committee (FSC) held a hearing entitled "Examining the Dangers of the FSOC's Designation Process and its Impact on the U.S. Financial System." Testimony was presented by:

  • Paul S. Atkins, CEO, Patomak Global Partners
  • F. William McNabb, Chairman and CEO, Vanguard, on behalf of the Investment Company Institute
  • Eugene Scalia, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
  • Michael S. Barr, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
  • Deron Smithy, Treasurer, Regions Bank, on behalf of the Regional Bank Coalition
  • Peter J. Wallison, Arthur F. Burns Fellow in Financial Policy Studies, American Enterprise Institute

This hearing focused on the Financial Stability Oversight Council's (FSOC) process for designating nonbank financial institutions as systemically important financial institutions (SIFI). There was also discussion regarding FSOC's voting structure, the criteria used in the SIFI designation process and a perceived lack of transparency in FSOC's deliberations.

The hearing memo circulated by the FSC's majority staff prior to the hearing noted that "[t]he FSOC has repeatedly been criticized for operating with little transparency. . . [and] typically excludes members of the public, the media, Members of Congress, and regulators who are not FSOC Members from its meetings." The memo also states that "the FSOC does not keep detailed minutes of its meetings . . . [and some] have complained that the FSOC's designation decisions provide minimal data and little analysis to justify those decisions." Several members of the FSC called on FSOC to halt the consideration of additional companies for SIFI designation.

Highlights from the Hearing

  • Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX), noting the strongly-worded dissents to FSOC's designation of Prudential, asked several of the witnesses about that designation. Scalia argued that the Prudential decision was "poorly reasoned" and "thinly substantiated." Scalia noted that the FSOC members with insurance expertise were "very troubled" by the analysis of the majority. Wallison stated that none of FSOC's SIFI designations have included "specific information" describing how the financial difficulty at the designated companies could lead to economic instability.
  • Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) asked Wallison whether the Financial Stability Board (FSB) would have designated U.S. insurers as global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFI) without the consent of the U.S. members of the FSB, including the Treasury Department. Wallison stated that he believes that the FSB must have had the "agreement" of its U.S. participants. Separately, he expressed concern that the FSB's development of global standards might be viewed by some as similar to the Basel III process, where bank capital standards are developed internationally and then implemented by U.S. regulators. Accordingly, Wallison explained that some people - including members of the FSB - may expect that since a company has been designated as a G-SIFI, it will necessarily be designated as a SIFI by the FSOC.
  • Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-NC) asked what will happen in five to ten years if nonbank SIFIs are subject to bank capital standards, as is required under the Collins Amendment. Scalia stated that there may be competitive risks as insurers determined to be SIFIs will be subject to different standards than the rest of the industry. He continued that bank capital standards may impact the ability of regulators to monitor insurance company nonbank SIFIs, as the standards may not accurately reflect and/or address an insurer's risks.

Additional Topics Covered at the Hearing

  • The role of the FSB in identifying systemically important companies and addressing systemic risk.
  • Concerns regarding the designation of SIFIs before the Federal Reserve develops capital standards for regulating designated companies.
  • The appeal process for companies designated as SIFIs, including whether companies have access to the information FSOC considered.
  • Whether credit default swaps should be regulated as insurance.
  • The market risk posed by cyber threats and attacks.
  • Whether the Office of Financial Research (OFR) reports should be subject to public comment and if the OFR should be required to discuss their findings with prudential regulators.
  • The potential impact of SIFI designations on state-based insurance regulation.
  • Potential changes/improvements in the FSOC's SIFI designation process and/or FSOC's statutory authority.

Legislation Covered at the Hearing

On April 3, 2014, Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) introduced H.R. 4387, or the ''FSOC Transparency and Accountability Act'' to address the concerns of some members of Congress, including how certain agencies will make their decisions on FSOC matters. The legislation amends Section 111 of the Dodd-Frank Act that provides that the following persons are voting members of FSOC:

  • Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
  • Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Chairperson Commodity Futures Trading Commission
  • Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration Board
  • Chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Under the proposed legislation, the votes of these individuals would be determined by using the agency's normal voting procedures.

The proposed legislation would also make the following changes:

  • FSOC members would be able to allow their staff members to attend FSOC meetings;
  • Members of the FSC and the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs (Senate Banking) would be allowed to attend and participate in all FSOC meetings, whether public or not;
  • FSC and Senate Banking members and staff would be able to attend and participate in meetings of the member agencies of FSOC; and
  • FSOC meetings would be subject to 5 USC § 552b, "The Government in the Sunshine Act."

Congressional Hearing on Legislative Proposals

On May 20, 2014, the Housing and Insurance Subcommittee of the Financial Services Committee held a hearing entitled "Legislative Proposals to Reform Domestic Insurance Policy." Testimony was presented by:

  • Joe E. Carter, Vice President, Business Development and Marketing, United Educators

  • Gary Hughes, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, American Council of Life Insurers

  • Tom Karol, Federal Affairs Counsel, National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies

  • Joseph C. Kohmann, CFO and Treasurer, Westfield Group, on behalf of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America

  • Daniel Schwarcz, Associate Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School

The bills/discussion drafts discussed at the hearing included:

  • H.R. 605, the Insurance Consumer Protection and Solvency Act of 2013. The legislation exempts insurance companies from an assessment by the FDIC in connection with the "orderly liquidation" of a failed financial institution. The assessment was provided for in Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act.

  • H.R. 4557, the Policyholder Protection Act of 2014. The legislation extends the policyholder protections of the Bank Holding Company Act to bank-affiliated insurers organized as thrift holding companies. The legislation limits the authority of the regulator of a thrift holding company to require that insurance company funds be provided to a subsidiary or affiliated depository institution.

  • H.R. __, the Risk Retention Modernization Act of 2014. The discussion draft grants risk retention groups the authority to offer additional types of commercial lines of insurance. The discussion draft includes language that would pre-empt state laws that limit or prohibit risk retention groups from offering any type of commercial insurance, except for group health, life or disability insurance or workers' compensation insurance.

  • H.R. __, the Insurance Data Protection Act. The discussion draft provides additional procedural limitations on the authority of the FIO and the OFR to subpoena data from insurance companies. Under the discussion draft, subpoenas will require approval of the Secretary of the Treasury Department and an agreement to reimburse companies for the cost of producing subpoenaed data and/or documents. The discussion draft also provides that state or federal regulators must maintain the confidentiality of nonpublic information collected from other regulators.

  • H.R. 4510, the Capital Standards Clarification Act of 2014 gives the Federal Reserve flexibility in determining the capital standards that insurers will be subject to under the Collins Amendment. FIO Focus issue 51 provides additional information on H.R. 4510 and its companion bill, S. 2270.

TRIA Discussed at the Legislative Proposals Hearing

At the outset of the hearing Rep. Neugebauer said he expects that the FSC will release legislation to extend TRIA sometime in June. Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) and Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) expressed disappointment that TRIA legislation was not being discussed at the hearing.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nelson Brown & Co. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nelson Brown & Co.
Contact
more
less

Nelson Brown & Co. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.