Five Lessons Learned at a PTAB Hearing


Following a recent hearing involving K&L Gates’ lawyers before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) on behalf of the patent owner in an inter partes reexamination, several key practice tips emerged that may be useful as clients and counsel encounter the increase in post-grant proceedings. This particular appearance related to an appeal brought by a third-party requester, but the lessons learned apply to any form of oral advocacy, and may be particularly useful for patent prosecutors newly before the PTAB.

As background, the PTAB’s duties are to:

i. on written appeal of an applicant, review adverse decisions of the examiner;

ii. review appeals of reexaminations (including appeals of already pending inter partes  reexaminations);

iii. conduct derivation proceedings; and

iv. conduct inter partes  reviews and post-grant reviews. See 35 U.S.C. § 6(a).

In an inter partes reexamination, after receiving a Right of Appeal Notice (final action) adverse to the patentability or confirming the patentability of the patent at issue, the patent owner or third-party requester may appeal to the PTAB and has the option of requesting an oral hearing. See MPEP Section 2674. The purpose of the oral hearing is to enable the parties to orally advocate the positions taken in their appeal briefs and to enable the PTAB to question the parties. After the PTAB renders its decision, appeals of PTAB decisions are made to the Federal Circuit.

Five Practice Tips and Observations

1. Know the Record
Knowledge of the record (prosecution history, references, case law, and related proceedings) is paramount. A deep grasp of the record will supply you ready answers and references to potentially specific questions from the PTAB. Similarly, you will also be able to call out the other party’s new and/or modified arguments in your rebuttal. The PTAB will appreciate your ability to efficiently provide focused information that can help them help you.

2. Avoid New Argument
In a recent hearing, an appellant introduced new arguments, but the PTAB was very quick to interject and ask where these arguments were in the appeal briefing. The PTAB let the appellant make these arguments, but strongly suggested, given the limited argument time, that the appellant focus on the issues raised for appeal.

3. Be Prepared to Answer Questions Not at Issue on Appeal
While the parties are expected to adhere to the issues as briefed, the PTAB can ask whatever it wants. During preparation, think outside the box and consider what could happen if prosecution were re-opened or where there may be abstract questions not necessarily reflected in the issues for appeal. In a recent hearing, the PTAB asked questions related to the prior art, the obviousness inquiry, and the invention itself, all of which were framed as “hypothetical.” Be prepared to field these questions, but be careful not to attempt to inject unsupported expert-like evidence. Do not speculate, and defer to written arguments, if necessary.

4. The PTAB Allows Visual Demonstratives
While the PTAB cautioned against the introduction of new argument not of record, in this matter, it did allow demonstrative slides. The slides, or other forms of demonstrative exhibits, can serve a helpful illustrative function as long as used properly. The PTAB will have questions and you will be rebutting arguments by the other side. Accordingly, do not be beholden to the planned order of your presentation or plan to read from a “script.” Note that you must request that audio-visual equipment be set up at least three days in advance of your hearing.

5. The PTAB Allows the Appellant Rebuttal Time
In an inter partes  reexamination appeal, each appellant and respondent has 30 minutes of argument time. The examiner has 20 minutes if they elect to appear (did not appear in our case). See MPEP Section 2680. The PTAB indicated that the appellant third-party requester in our case was to present first and could reserve any desired amount of time from its 30 minutes for rebuttal. The respondent only gets one block of 30 minutes. If you are the appellant, be sure to reserve rebuttal time.

Obviously, these observations and tips are not all-encompassing, but hopefully they are useful.

Topics:  Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Patent Litigation, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patents

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »