Fla. justices reject keystones of partisans’ plan to undercut patients’ rights

by Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers
Contact

As congressional Republicans pursue their counter factual campaign this week to strip patients of their rights to pursue legal redress for harms they suffer while seeking medical services, the Florida Supreme Court has sent a powerful message to federal lawmakers about the wrongheadedness of some of their key notions.

The justices in Tallahassee have repudiated state lawmakers’ assertions of the existence of a “malpractice crisis,” in which dire action is needed to ensure doctors can get affordable liability insurance and be sufficiently protected to practice good medicine.

They also have rejected caps on patients’ claims for pain and suffering, finding that these limits on “non-economic” damages violate constitutional rights to equal protection under the law, and “arbitrarily reduce damage awards for plaintiffs who suffer the most drastic injuries.”

Sound familiar? The House has advanced but not voted yet on a medical malpractice proposal, HR 1215. It’s supposed to come to the House floor this week. But its proponents, including Tom Price, an orthopedist and the Health and Human Services secretary, have argued without sound evidence that the bill is needed because there are too many claims against doctors, who, as a result, are practicing costly defensive medicine, partly to ensure that insurers will continue to offer them affordable coverage.

Such claims have been widely debunked by independent, nonpartisan, and authoritative experts. They underscore that malpractice claims are low, focused on a few doctors with multiple claims, and that liability coverage is available and affordable so MDs need not engage in defensive practices. Those don’t contribute nearly as much as advocates claim to the skyrocketing costs of medical services.

Those interested in a deeper dive into the topic with excellent information—with detailed citations of sources—may wish to check out the newly updated “Briefing Book: Medical Malpractice by the Numbers” from the  Center for Justice and Democracy at New York University.

The Florida high court decision also makes excellent points, as the justices sorted through the horrors experienced by a patient who hoped to get her wrist pain fixed but ended up with debilitating neurologic damage, instead. The court found that the woman, who was put under for her carpal tunnel surgery, had her esophagus pierced when intubated. She experienced excruciating pain when she regained consciousness, and her anesthesiologist, unaware of her harm, checked her heart and gave her drugs for her chest pain. She was sent home, where she fell unconscious but was discovered by a neighbor, who rushed her back to the hospital for care.

Weeks later, after multiple surgeries and a medically induced coma, the patient regained consciousness. She sued because she said her treatment had traumatized her and left her with constant pain and debilitation. Jurors heard her case and assessed her damages at $4 million—a sum she would need to take care of herself for a lifetime but was reduced under Florida law by about three-quarters due to damage caps.

The court tore into these limits, asking whether state lawmakers were justified in imposing them, particularly by claiming the existence of a “crisis” in the availability and affordability of malpractice insurance for doctors. The justices saw none, and asked whether it made sense to link doctors’ insurance woes with patients’ rights to protection under the law. They found it unacceptable, too, that the patients most grievously injured, compensated the most by jurors, suffered most due to damage caps that slashed into what they might receive.

In my practice, I see the big harms that patients suffer while seeking medical services, and I know that the process of seeking legal redress is unfamiliar and difficult for them. But they and their families confront the reality that will need economic and other support, sometimes for a lifetime, and sometimes the best and only way to get this is through the civil justice system.

To be fair, as the dissenting Florida justices noted, lawmakers and not courts may be in a more optimal place to study and determine broad public policy issues, including good ways to make the health care system operate soundly. But this means legislators must operate rationally, factually, and with the public good in mind—not based on partisanship and bad evidence.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers
Contact
more
less

Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.