Florida Legislature Repeals Longstanding Law On Terms Of Courts And Creates New Law Affecting Appellate Court’s Ability To Recall Mandate

In the 2013 legislative session, the Florida Legislature repealed the set of statutes that originated at the turn of the twentieth century setting terms of courts for all of Florida’s circuit courts, district courts of appeal, and the supreme court.  The law becomes effective January 1, 2014.  See Ch. 2-13-25, § 25, Laws of Fla. (2013).

In place of set court terms, the Legislature created sections 43.43.  This new statute gives the Florida Supreme Court the discretion to (1) establish terms of court for the Supreme Court, the district courts of appeal, and the circuit courts; (2) authorize those courts to establish their own terms of court; or (3) dispense with terms altogether.

Of particular relevance to appellate practitioners, however, is the creation of section 43.44, which applies to appellate court mandates.  That new section provides:

An appellate court may, as the circumstances and justice of the case may require, reconsider, revise, reform, or modify its own opinions and orders for the purpose of making the same accord with law and justice. Accordingly, an appellate court may recall its own mandate for the purpose of allowing it to exercise such jurisdiction and power in a proper case. A mandate may not be recalled more than 120 days after it has been issued.

Ch. 2013-25, § 10, Laws of Fla. (2013).  This statute changes longstanding decisional law, holding that “the jurisdiction of an appellate court over its judgments persists to the end of the term at which the judgment is rendered, and then absolutely terminates, in the absence of statute or rule having the effect of a statute in force to the contrary.”  Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co., 397 So. 2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (citing Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal Church, 138 So. 630 (Fla. 1932)).

Whether section 43.44 restricts or broadens an appellate court’s ability to alter a final decision by recalling its mandate depends of course on when the decision would have been issued during the court’s former term.  If a decision had been entered early on during the court’s term, section 43.44 now restricts the time limit during which the appellate court could recall its mandate. On the other hand, if the decision had been entered near the end of the court’s term, section 43.44 expands the time within which the court could recall its mandate.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields Jorden Burt | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.