In This Issue:
..Ninth Circuit Affirms Lodestar Attorneys’ Fees
..Court Dismisses for Lack of Standing But Applies Pom Wonderful to Avoid Primary Jurisdiction
..Court Finds Pre-Answer Certification Motion Premature
..Court Relies on Plaintiff’s Own Scientific Resources to Dismiss With Prejudice
..Court Stays Previously Dismissed ECJ Case
- New Filings
- Excerpt from Ninth Circuit Affirms Lodestar Attorneys’ Fees:
In re: Ferrero Litig., No. 12-56469 (9th Cir.): The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court’s final settlement approval and award of attorneys’ fees, over objection, in a putative class action alleging that defendant misrepresents the health benefits of its Nutella products. The settlement awarded $550,000 in settlement funds, along with certain non-monetary relief, in contrast to $1 million in attorneys’ fees. The court held that the district court could properly rely on the lodestar method of awarding attorneys’ fees rather than the typical 25% cap applied when the court relies on a percentage of the settlement fund. The court also found that notice was properly given and that there was no indication of collusion justifying overturning approval of the settlement, and refused to search for any.
Please see full Newsletter below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.