Foreign Defendants May Encounter Additional Burdens When Challenging “Personal Jurisdiction”

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

“Even if a foreign defendant does not have continuous and systematic contact with the forum state, such as retaining offices, employees, or a corporate presence in the forum state, it may still face personal jurisdiction in a United States court,” says Orrick partner Laurie Strauch Weiss, head of the Mass Torts and Product Liability Practice.

On October 19, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ordered an evidentiary hearing for a Taiwanese corporate defendant. The goal of the hearing was to determine whether the foreign defendant had sufficient contacts with the State of Maryland to enable the Court to exercise “personal jurisdiction” over the defendant. This decision to order a Court hearing on the issue adds a new element of risk and potential legal liability for foreign defendants to consider when doing business in the United States.

Please see full Article below for further information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide