Foresight in Hindsight: An Insight into Ahmed v. Stefaniu and De-Biasing Legal Evaluations of Reasonable Care

more+
less-

Abstract:

The recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Ahmed v. Stefaniu, [2006] O.J. No. 4185 (C.A.) is considered in detail. This case involved a jury verdict of negligence against a psychiatrist who had previously decided that a patient who ultimately murdered his sister ought to be a voluntary patient. Ms. Pengelley argues that hindsight bias came into play when the jury considered whether Dr. Stefaniu had met the required standard of care.

Ms. Pengelley's treatise references the seminal 1975 study of psychologist Baruch Fischoff. He underlined the principle that not only did learning of the outcome create hindsight bias, but also that we appear unable to disregard such information. Educating individuals about hindsight bias and asking them to be careful not to be influenced by the information appears to have little effect. Perhaps the best explanation as to why people show hindsight bias, rests in the idea that people try to make post facto sense of the world around them.

Possible solutions to these difficulties are found in bifurcated trials. This can involve the jury hearing evidence about the defendant's conduct and first making a decision about whether the requisite standard of care has been met. Then, it can hear evidence about causation and quantum of damages. Alternatively, a second jury could be asked to determine the damages issue. It is argued that Binnie J. opened the door to bifurcation in Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595. To date, the case law indicates that Canadian trial courts should exercise bifurcation only in the clearest cases.

Ms. Pengelley admits that bifurcation is not necessarily foolproof. Bifurcated trials also are not very practical tools in our overburdened judicial system. Nonetheless, counsel's awareness of potential hindsight bias will allow them to tailor their advocacy to take this key factor into consideration in order to improve their odds of success.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Education Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Products Liability Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pamela Pengelley, Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »