Forest Fire Does Not Absolve the Government of Takings Liability

more+
less-

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that the Government cannot avoid liability for burning commercially valuable timber because it burned the timber to stop a forest fire. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims recently dismissed the case of TrinCo Investment Co. v. United States based on the “doctrine of necessity,” which the Supreme Court has described as justifying “the destruction of real and personal property, in cases of actual necessity, to prevent the spreading of fire or to forestall other grave threats to the lives and property of others.”

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nancie G. Marzulla, Marzulla Law, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Reporters on Deadline