The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that the Government cannot avoid liability for burning commercially valuable timber because it burned the timber to stop a forest fire. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims recently dismissed the case of TrinCo Investment Co. v. United States based on the “doctrine of necessity,” which the Supreme Court has described as justifying “the destruction of real and personal property, in cases of actual necessity, to prevent the spreading of fire or to forestall other grave threats to the lives and property of others.”
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.