Former US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Writes Against the Death Penalty in New York Review of Books


Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens believed in capital punishment at one time; he does not support the death penalty today. And, in an article published in the December 23, 2010, issue of the New York Review of Books (available now online), entitled “On the Death Sentence,” Justice Stevens tells us why.

What John Paul Stevens has written is a review of a book, of course. He’s providing his opinion on the merits of David Garland’s new work, Peculiar Institution: America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition (Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, 417 pp., $35.00). It is the New York Review of Books and Stevens’ commentary on the death penalty necessarily parallels his analysis of Garland’s contribution and its merits.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Criminal Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Terence Lenamon | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »